By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
vlad321 said:
Barozi said:
vlad321 said:
Barozi said:

vlad321 said:

Actually, I don't own a PS3 at all ( I don't know where this knowledge comes from but you are wrong yet again, I honestly lost count how many times that makes in a single thread), nor do I own a 360 (no point in wasting money in rip-offs of the PC). I do own a Wii but that's back home with my brother. I have unlimited access to all 3 however since I'm living with a few really good friends of mine (will continue to do so until I graduate), and they own those (we actually have 2 360s but meh). I very highly suggest you stop with all your assumptions because you keep making a bigger and bigger idiot of yourself. Then again if you do I will lose the source of great entertainment so I guess it'd be better off if you don't.

News flash CoD4 was not a good shooter, it was your typical watered down console shooter, so I'm sorry if I don't even care. Maybe when a shooter that can come even close to matching Half-Life 2/UT2004 on a console I'll start caring, but I doubt that will e happening any time soon. What I do care is that now with the mod tools we get utterly free and endless content for Fallout 3 that is created by the community. You can go ahead and keep on paying for your trashy and useless DLC (at least this one), I'll stick to my free content. I'm sure that anyone who has a PC that can run FO3 would choose the PC version over the 360 given the community support, so obviously it's hurting sales in some way.

As for windows, who said I'm using windows at all? I could just as easily be running on an apple or using linux. I am in fact running on windows, but that really does not mean one is required to have windows to run games. As I said previously, stop assuming, it makes you look like a fool. It seems like you are the one needing basic high school education.

You = FAIL

I'm sure over 99,5% on this side will agree with me.

Let me guess.... those 99,5% are all console gamers? Then again even a lot of PC gamers think I'm crazy when I call CS a weak game. When it comes down the the wire, TF2 is a far better game than CoD4, and that's why CoD4 didn't sell at all, like I said, it's jsut a mediocre shooter, paling when compared to TF2.

The problem is you prefer multiplayer only games over singleplayer games. CoD 1 was AAA, Cod 2 even better. CoD 3 was waaay worse, but not because it was only released on consoles (we all know it was Treyarch's fault). CoD 4 is for me personally even better than CoD 2 (which was the pinnacle in the series for me).

No other shooter series can deliver such a great atmosphere. No, not even Half Life. UT has zero atmosphere and TF2 as well. I'll better not start to talk about a storyline.....

That's not true, HL2 has absolutely no multiplayer and I'd rank it better than any console shooter that I can think of, so it's not just multi-player shooters. Also CoD 1 was not AAA, it was just AA, and I did feel like HL1's atmosphere definitely trumped CoD1's, several years before CoD1 even came out.

If you don't consider Half Life 2: Deathmatch as the multiplayer... well I agree it doesn't come directly with the game, but you can download it for free, when you own the full game (Not too sure about that)

By the way I think HL2 is the best shooter to date and HL2 Deathmatch has the best deathmatch mode of any game.

But I have no concerns to name HL2 and CoD4 in one sentence as AAA games.