steven787 said:
I didn't choose them, those are the two that they were comparing.
I would choose these two to demonstrate the problem. One is a gaming PC, the other is a production PC. Apple just doesn't make high end performance for gamers. (I only included prices for a reference, when you're in the high end a couple thousand bucks isn't that big of a deal) Alienware Intel® Core™ i7-965 Extreme 3.2 GHz 8MB Cache Dual 2GB GDDR5 ATI® Radeon® HD 4870 X2 with CrossFireX™ and Quad GPU Technology 12GB DDR3 SDRAM at 1600MHz - 6 x 2048MB Intel® X-58 Motherboard- Socket 1366 Core i7 Ready, Dual Triple Channel DDR3 Memory 600GB (2 x 300GB) Velociraptor SATA 3.0Gb/s 10,000RPM 2 x 16MB Cache 4x Dual Layer Blu-ray Burner (BD-RE, DVD±RW, CD-RW) $6500
Apple Mac Pro: Two 3.2GHz Quad-Core Intel Xeon 8GB (4x2GB) 2X300GB 15,000 RPM NVIDIA Quadro FX 5600 1.5GB
$10,699.00 16 GB $13,499.00
There just completely different machines. But if you look at notebooks, you will see what they are saying. Top of the line Mac Book Pro available.
$3,049.00 Non-top of the Line Alienware Notebook
$3,349.00 or Intel® Core™2 T9600 2.8GHz (6MB Cache, 1066MHz FSB) $2,649.00 |
okay then, they still said tested so far, im sure in the time since vista came out to that point in time (9 months) they tested more then two laptops now the specs of the others are not listed and it is a bit odd they used those two as units in the demo.
but they did say tested so far, and this is a pc magazine, not an apple/mac publication. so I take what they say a bit more seriously then what say mac addict says when it rates the mac vs pcs
now that might be a different story in current specs, especially since the macbook pro 17 inch has not been refeshed this year
apples are the best value and generally a good price for the money (to even a great price) when they first come out
as for the current 17 inch its not been refreshed it will have an extreme like the 15 inch when it does get it... the lack of refresh was explained as something to do with issues with the display manufacturer
and if you do want blueray, yes pc is the way to go despite apple sitting on the blue ray board, Jobs, has stated his displsure with the current state of the media, so its a no go for now.... its kinda strange in that regard as apple was the first to ditch 3.25 floppies for cd only, and the first to push usb 2. and firewire.
edit, aslo you can pimp out that mac pro tower to have 4 quad core cpus, at a faster clock speed... I would not buy ram from aple though they still charge an arm and leg for it, but you could pop 32 gb in there.
the mac pro is also in line for a refresh but dont expect it to happen until january... they have been streaching the pro line refresh time further and further out since the intel switch... you can no longer expect a refresh very 6 months now on some lines its a year, some 18 months (mac mini), others seem held up by lawsuits (apple is suing the makers of the displays for price fixing, dell joined in on the suit, and i think lenvano did too) or manufaturing issues (sony battery recall again)
come play minecraft @ mcg.hansrotech.com
minecraft name: hansrotec
XBL name: Goddog







