| Allgameconsoles said: Its a shame Sony wasted a good console. We all wanted to to be the best but with poor management, poor titles (for the most part) poor ports, less graphics (720p) they where doomed. They paid alot of advertising $ for some high review score but peopl are getting apprehensive, the PS3 Forum is fixed as they delete all negative threads to make all seem rosey. MGS4 is still so cool though. Now there special for example is people with not as good credit have to pay more for it, and the promotion of two people staring at a brick wall , saying, "Whats on your list" makes me want to pull my hair out.. x12celtics3 is a stalker. |
What?
Poor titles? The PS3 lineup is every bit as good as the 360s. Please don't give me metacritic figures to say otherwise. In the end, it's opinion.
Poor ports? Every single 360-PS3 port (okay, 9/10) have been superior on PS3. Oblivion, BioShock, Eternal Sonata. All updated. The only port on PS3 which was worse than the original wa The Orange Box.
Less graphics? The PS3 supports 1080p. Quite a few of the games support 1080p. Pretty much every game upscales to 1080p.
Sony did not pay money for any review scores. Why on earth would they do that? They're not making the games, are they? And if they did moneyhat reviewers, I'd say they did a pretty horrible job of it.
Obviously people can't bash the PS3 in the PS3 forum, it's a PS3 forum. Don't use it if you don't like it.
People with not as good credit have to pay more for it? What?
(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective 
