Sevengen on 02 December 2008
| CGI-Quality said: @ Sevengen Well before you attack me, know who I was arguing with. Second of all the Wii started outselling the PS3 and 360 long before the 360's price ever left the $399.99 price point and OF COURSE when PS3 was still $599.99. Beyond that scarcity (which the Wii has remained pretty much since the start of it's life) + cheaper price - like 360 is now, created more demand. The difference with Wii is the 360 has not compared to the Wii's continued momentum due to the facts I stated above. So that kills your point with the Wii. Now on to Infamous, he thought he countered my argument with some sales figures he called facts, but was debunked and he denied it. Infamous never answered ONE question I asked. He just ranted about how he proved leo-j and I wrong with his “opinions” and how he should be credited for arguing the best online. Now my question to you is: where are you going with this? |
first off, it's sorta weak to point out someone's mistake AFTER another person already beat you to it. I was wrong about the name. Done. Secondly, I'm not attacking you so much as trying to get an answer from you. I've been through all the pages in this topic and lost count of how many times I saw $200 vs. $400 in your posts, which is honestly a disservice to the 360 and everything it's accomplished. It's perfectly natural to play favorites, as the PS3... or anything Playstation for that matter... appears to be an unfortunate bias on your part, but at the very least try and temper your posts with a little perspective. You didn't kill my point about the Wii, because 'I' wasn't making one with it, ... you're words were, "hence, higher sales for the cheaper console" and I was asking that if that were true, why isn't the Arcade selling more than the Wii. You can bring up momemtum all you want, but again, "hence, higher sales for the cheaper console" So, watch how you say things, cause some people will catch you on them. Also, I didn't hear an answer from you about why the Pro and Elite sold more than the PS3, which discounts the $200 vs. $400 things. Why did you avoid that? Why did you avoid my question about the PS3 losing 2007. Now, on to your question: I guess I won't be going anywhere with this if you continue to avoid honest debate by changing subjects, answering other's with questions of your own instead dealing with their's first. Here's a simple one. Since all of the respective 360 models are outselling the PS3 by such a large margin, does that mean they're a better value to the general public?
