tuoyo said:
Spankey said:
EaglesEye379 said:
Spankey said:
for my reply, I will quote tuoyo:
"If I said what I want to say in reply to this post I would get a ban so I would just say it in my head and leave you to imagine what I am saying and also leave you to continue to stew in your ignorance"
|
I am asking you a serious question. Are you saying you are incapable of replying an informative reply without insulting or calling people ignorant? Is it so hard to believe that there are people out there not interested in buying Blu-Rays or DVDs?
|
wow, so touchy!
I gave my reasoning, read it.
16.71 million people seem to be interested in it to date which should answer your question.
Or did I understand your post incorrectly?
It's pretty difficult to decode.
and as for "Is it so hard to believe that there are people out there not interested in buying Blu-Rays or DVDs?"
no it's not.
Worldwide there are billions of people obviously not interested in any gaming or home entertainment system. there are millions of people not interested in anything except trying to stay alive right now. so...what's your point?
|
Ok I might sue you for quoting me in such a wrong fashion. There may be 16.71 people that own PS3 but that does not mean all those people are interested in Blu Ray. I would say if PS3 did not have a blu ray player then there would probably be about 25 to 35 million PS3s sold by now. Many of those 16.71 people wanted to get the new Playstation but due to Sony's obsession with the format war they were not given a choice of whether they wanted blu ray or not. Truth of the matter is most people are not interested in spending more on movies for slight improvement in quality.
|
How can 0.71 of a person own a PS3? Lol.
I suppose all of the Sony divisions have to work together. Without the PS3, Blu-ray may not have won the format war. Without blu-ray, we wouldn't have MGS4. Everyone's happy, except the people who couldn't afford 600 bucks for a console (it's 400 now)