By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
leo-j said:
soulsamurai said:

it's a game that beats COD4.....thats why. It is much better then a COD4 and that was the thing that actually beat halo.

 

 like it matters, resistance 2 is a much better game than cod4, and despite WaW lacking the quality game that cod4 was, most of the potential R2 buyers went with cod WaW instead..

 

Hell no, resistance 2 wasn't better than CoD4. R2 had a run-of-the-mill campaign if there ever was one, and while the online shown equally as bright,, CoD4 has the best campaign in a shooter, EVA.

World at War isn't that bad Leo-J, it has a better campaign than R2, basically. You're just hating. R2 is good, but it's strength lies in its online multiplayer, which is CoD4ish in quality.

I remember when R2 came out and you said it was the best shooter ever, man, that's not even close to true. I definitely think you over-rated the game in that thread, and I think you need to replay CoD4 and R2 with fresh eyes.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.