S.T.A.G.E. said:
crumas2 said:
Infamy79 said:
Except that's like saying a PS3 that sells for $5 would have 99% of the market. I know what you're trying to say, but if its a little from both sides.
It's like Mercedes Benz, they charge a premium for their product because they have a high perceived value, but at the end of the day, if you can't afford one, then it doesn't matter how much value it has, you simply can't afford it.
|
The flip side of the argument is "they don't need to sell a Mercedes Benz for cheap." They don't sell like a low-end Honda, but with the price-point they don't need to.
Not that I disagree with you. On the contrary, your argument is spot on. I just think Sony should leave the price where it is unless they start bleeding market share to 360 in buckets.
|
They have been bleeding marketshare. As Sony plummets, Blu Ray sales go up.
|
You lost me on that one. Are you saying the PS3 is bleeding market share to the 360 or to standalone Blu-ray players?
