| Geldorn said: Heh. I do so love people trying to 'prove' their points using Metacritic. |
And then those same people claim that metacritic is awful and should not be trusted.
Use IGN, seriously. All of their reviews are well-written and properly scored. I can't say the same about EuroGamer, Gamespot and 1UP. And guess what? All three of those publications' scores contribute to the metascore, EuroGamer with its MGS4 8/10, Gamespot with its Tools of Destruction 7.5/10, and of course 1UP with their Resistance 2 B+ (the same people that gave Soulcalibur 4 an A).
Metacritic is not a gauge of quality. It includes various publications that base their reviews on five minutes of gameplay, or a trailer, or another review. The three I named are among the BEST that metacritic uses.
Also, the X360 has more games, and more high-rated games, in general. You know this, OP, so I'm going to assume this is a joke post...
EDIT: Are you honestly going to get less enjoyment out of an 89, compared to a 90? Is an 84 fundamentally worse than an 85? And these keep changing, so a game can, indeed, go from being an 89 to an AMAZINGLY DIFFERENT 90+ AAA title as time goes on, and vice versa.
(Former) Lead Moderator and (Eternal) VGC Detective 
