hunter_alien on 02 November 2008
| talkingparrot said: A) Your using a youtube video to compare two games that run at 720p. There is no way for the normal person to discern differences with that shitty of quality. B) I have played both Gears 1 and Killzone 2 (at a trade event), and can easily tell you Killzone 2 has the leg up in graphics. Why? In motion there are an insane amount of effects that will overwhelm your senses. C) You posted a Gametrailers video, youtube-ized it, than used it as a comparison video. You took compressed garbage, urinated on it, and served it as a main course. Credibility lost. D) When you get the game in your hands, and are able to discern the lighting, the real time Anti Aliasing, the insane detail not only in textures (and this game is a FPS not a TPS where you are fixed away from them) but in the guns, characters, and environments, you'll truly realize this game is a technical leap ahead. I don't understand you Xbox 360 fans. You've had it good for TWO years. There are only a handful of games that cannot be done on the 360, (Uncharted being one), but when a developer truly taps the power of PS3, you come out with - "Oh Killzone 2 looks good, but not that much better." Irony. |
A is more then enough for this thread to fail ;)
Vote the Mayor for Mayor!
