| Magnific0 said: goddog: oh, no. IF the PS3 had a $50 price cut this year, that would be a desperation move, a fire sale as I put it. But from launch to dec 07? they effectively cut the price $100, but it was not the same product (features) 'cause the new 80GB was not full BC as the $600 60GB, and the new 40GB introduced october 07 at $400 you know all it lacks , so don't play dumb dude. |
i think cutting features out to meet cost cuts is desperate. its not dumb on my part your delusional if you cant see how bad that first year was for sony, and given the state of the world economy especially the yen staying up, despite my belief that the ps3 would have a march cut (which i have posted many times) i now feel that if this quarter does not turn a profit you will not see a ps3 price cut until after the next 360 pricecut, which as i said should happen next october. now this offers a two fold advatage for sony as a company, despite being forced into a cut in that senerio they can play it off like they planned it since they had not made a cut in over a year, it also makes the 360 look bad with 2 cuts, and should lead to the ps3 selling more than the 360 and blunting next years price cut and halo recon launch. it would have allowed all the sales at the current price to be tapped out and the pent up demand should spark holliday style weeks. though thats only if sony waits if they do it in march, its just a planed cut with a decent boost, hence my moving it back. where it would look better to share holders, and help the bottom line more
come play minecraft @ mcg.hansrotech.com
minecraft name: hansrotec
XBL name: Goddog
