By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Staude said:
@LordTheNightKnight

Well nintendo has never gone in the red for it's costumers ? (1)
and i'm sorry but nintendos things seem really over priced. with a lot of their products compaired to the actual value of it. (2) Now i know that buisness is all about earning money in the end, but they don't seem to want to take a hit. Ever. And in some ways that is a good thing. But not in all ways. The motion thing might have cost them a little more but they could have implanted it, they even said they would but they chose not to do it in the end.

Nintendo probably do care for their customers in some ways, i'm not saying they don't but it certainly doesn't seem like they want to take any risks financially which might be understandable concidering they only make consoles and games (3), but you know.

Oh yeah and i know sony isn't doing this out of charity either. ..
BTW i blame poor grammer on lazy :P

 

1. That is just BS. Being unprofitable is not proof of more dedication to customers.

2. That's also BS. Entertainment is not a quantifiable thing, so it is a lie there is a greater value just because one is sold at a loss.

3. That's not "might be understandable". That's the very reason they don't take those risks.



A flashy-first game is awesome when it comes out. A great-first game is awesome forever.

Plus, just for the hell of it: Kelly Brook at the 2008 BAFTAs