AllAll said:
Might want to rethink that. Graphics Are you saying the wii can equall the PS3/360 in that ? How is realiity insulting. Should every MS/Sony fanboy cry "insults flamebait trolling" when sale are mentioned?
|
He didn't say that the Wii hardware was limited in those capacities he said, and I quote: "Wii hardware guaruntees it will never have the best games." Correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't remember the general opinion last generation being every game ever released was automatically ranked Xbox > GC > PS2, despite the fact that their system specifications were as such.
There are many ways for a game to be good, and just looking pretty and having lots of stuff on the screen is certainly not the only one. To make a blanket statement that the games will be bad simply on graphical capability is just like me saying all PS3 and 360 games suck because they can't be played with dual motion controllers. Obviously the PS3 and 360 don't share the technology of the Wii with free range of motion in each hand, yet I'm not saying it's "technologically impossible" for a PS3 or 360 game to be better.
Game quality depends on only one factor: development. Twilight Princess won Game of the Year over many games last year, even beating out the technologically far superior title Gears of War, despite being for all intents and purposes a gamecube game with motion controls tacked on. Lair certainly looks gorgeous doesn't it? The Wii is nowhere near capable of playing it right? Yet a simple online sports game like Super Mario Strikers got 2 full points higher on a review. Obviously according to that magazine's opinion, Lair is an inferior game to Strikers. You may disagree, but that's YOUR opinion. That's why you can't make a statement like that. All you can do is give your opinion, hence my original statement:
There is a large difference between giving opinions and trolling.








