Darc Requiem on 26 August 2008
| Kyros said: if you read the OPs post he also post the numbers it would take for the PS3 to surpass the 360 in 24months, 18 months, and 12 months. If Eh yes. But he also pretty clearly says that he thinks it will take 2.75 years based on his computations. Which are useless. So this assumption is equally useless. Which makes the thread pretty pointless. Things will not stay the same. Look at the PSP in Japan which suddenly took off like a rocket in sales. One important reason one game Monster Hunter. Or the PS2 which multiplied sales after it got cheaper. Perhaps the 360 gets a cool motion controller and outsells the PS3 or the PS3 will multiply sales after a price-drop. Who knows. In both cases making assumptions by extrapolating the past are useless. |
Kyros, you said his numbers were "garbage". I will say it again. In addition to his opinion, he posted the hard numbers it would take for the PS3 to pass the 360 at faster pace than his prediciton. Neither you nor Libellule have disputed the accuracy of his numbers. Since that is an admission to his accuracy, the basis of both of your arguments comes down to you saying your guess are better than the OPs. I stand by my original two posts.
@Rocket Pig
I couldn't have said it better myself. PS3 diehards keep sliding back the goals posts and its getting old.
