Comparing Exclusives:HD Console Graphics.

[forevercloud3000]

CAL4M1TY said:

The most important thing to take out of this thread is:

The inferiority complex some of the PS3 fanboys have that they needed to make a point about graphics by making a thread about it, often comparing unreleased or brand new games with games released 6+ months ago.

I would say the only fair comparison is Resistance VS Gears, but even then R1 was a launch title rushed vs Gears a year 1 title.

The only proper comparison is multiplatform titles, why? (note this includes MS bias to annoy the sony fanboys):
- When a game is 360 lead, the PS3 version alot of the time suffers (Madden and NHL prior to this years edition, Orange Box, FEAR, Enchanted Arms etc)
- When a game is PS3 lead, the difference is minimal at best (DMC4, Burnout Paradise, Assassin's Creed, VF5 gets online in the 360 version)

That's all the evidence you need.

(In reality: My view is that there is very little difference between the two consoles, heck even MGS4 didn't stun me, maybe I got used to the HD level when Gears first dropped, but I was more wowed by how polished the game was more then how graphically realistic it was. Also, so long as there's no slowdown, I doubt many of you really care about how the game looks when you're playing.)

It is funny that you said that.........seeing as this thread is not about which game actually plays better but which games are graphically superior.  Resistence is an awsome game but it is not the most graphically pleasing out there, every one knows that. People keep saying things like "Why dont you compare Resistence vs GeOW?". Yea, GeOW looked better then Resistence, which was a release title, WOOPTY DOO! The point is GeOW2 looks better then Gears1 (ever so slightly), Killzone 2 looks better then Resistence 1&2. How about we just skip the middle man and go for the main course shall we? That is why Killzone 2 got to pair off with Gears2.

If I wanted I could pair off plenty of mediocre games with sub par graphics, but I didnt. I am not her to start a flaimbait thread. These games are similar in nature and genre. Their artistic styles are similar as well. This is the best way to compare console graphics as many have stated countless times.

YOu can not get accurate readings from a multiplat game, as you already said that in your post. They tend to be somewhere around "even" and dont show enough to make an accurate judgement. Multiplat always leads to a Gimped game, on both sides.

You seemingly created this post to simply gain a rise from others. This makes you a troll(Odd to see someone with a Kingdom Hearts icon troll a PS3 thread). I started this thread because many times console owners wish to compare their games graphically, if only to message their own ego. Many times a website or publication unfairly tip graphics in the 360's favor as weALL have seen. This is one made by a common consumer who plays these games and stays in the loop of what is upcoming.

You only dissagree with the thread because it proves the PS3 can produce superior graphics, just as the XBOX could compared to the PS2...