@Nitekrawler: Most of the biggest complaints towards PS3 comes from M$:s viral marketing. The marketers ran over forums touting mantras like: PS3 has no games in comparision to 360 at the moment. It's the same thing as the 3rd parties don't sell on Wii, in comparision to 360 at the moment or Wii has only minigames aside from Zelda and a couple of 1st and 3rd party titles plus the 1st party big hitters that are soon to come (italics for what they "forgot" to say).
Basically they just tried to prove a point that didn't exist, since neither, Wii or PS3, have actually done any worse than 360 by any standards.
@Doats: Actually it doesn't have the chance, as long as "Nintendo" stands something new and fancy for the public. With Wiis success, it wins the next gen by default. But after the name becomes "commodity", it's possible for someone else to take over. Just what happened to Sony. PSX became somewhat a phenomenon and its success drove PS2 for the win. Now that the name "wore" during the two generations, people didn't find the name fun anymore and saw the PS3 offering the same as the PSX and PS2 did, while Nintendo had something new for them.
Ei Kiinasti.
Eikä Japanisti.
Vaan pannaan jalalla koreasti.
Nintendo games sell only on Nintendo system.
