By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kyros said:
Its number should remain fairly absolute.


True but the relative number is the important one. If the 360 has two games in one game category and the PS3 has 1 the advantage is significant. If the 360 has 6 and the PS3 has 5 the advantage is not so big anymore. Especially when those games are older and are not sold as often anymore. But yes the 360 has quite a few titles the PS3 doesn't have.

 

I agree. One point I forgot to mention about this article is that the commentator brings up the common assumption that the Xbox 360 version of FFXIII will be inferior due to the possibility of an increased amount of discs that must be used.

Fair point.

However, not one that an unbiased source would make, or even assume. It is more than likely knowledge learned as a generally accepted assumption from message boards. People who read message boards regularly pick favorites in the console wars. When men speak on a subject, or women for that matter, who have a great understanding, and a bias for one console, they can often convince others to join their cause, by presenting that cause and their beliefs not as an opinion, but as a fact. Some of us have more sinister motives, than being duped by an excellently worded fanboy. However, nobody that good would leave such outstanding errors of logic in their hard-worked article. No, this man's assumptions are flawed, probably due to an overwhelming and recent Sony revolution on his message board of choice. That's my final deduction.



I don't need your console war.
It feeds the rich while it buries the poor.
You're power hungry, spinnin' stories, and bein' graphics whores.
I don't need your console war.

NO NO, NO NO NO.