Oyvoyvoyv said:
OT: I am strongly against it. I cannot understand how people believe that actually works. Sure, it may work, but there is always a better way. |
If you believe in God, and the Bible, then according to him it is necessary and you hate your child if you never do.
But there is a difference between beating and punishing. It has worked for almost all of America's 40+ population, and it worked for large portions of the younger generation. I see more kids out of control now with parents who with just one quick smack would have their kids attention. However, a spanking is not the only form of discipline you should use.
I found this with a quick search (bolded parts of interest)
"While spanking is not illegal, bruising or otherwise injuring a child is. But what about mild spanking as a corrective measure? Is it a good idea? Spanking works best when coupled with other disciplinary measures, such as "time out." Research regarding behavior modification of children ages 2 to 6 found that spanking a child two times on either the rear or thigh helped improve compliance with "time out" for misbehavior. These children were more likely to remain in their room after acting up if a potential spank followed if they left before the time was up. Furthermore, pairing reasoning with a spanking in the toddler years delayed misbehavior longer than did either reasoning or spanking alone. Reasoning linked with a spank was also more effective compared with other discipline methods. Talking with the child about what behavior is expected and why-with the potential of a follow-up spank-worked best."
@faxandadu
it used to be that everyone spanked their child, so depending on how they interpret "beaten" then of course all current wife/child abusers were "beaten" when they were a child, so that is just misinformation.
(edit, didn't finish my sentance)
