Key Weakness of the Wii - Graphic Capabilites?

[bdbdbd]

@horriblebastard: Actually it's you who seem to be the fanboy, not me.
So, you agree then that the 1st party games in question are great? In order for a game to be great don't need to be innovative, although, even made with the same formula, SMG and TP are still very different from their predecessors, which can't be said about many PS360 games.
And what made you a Nintendo fan in the first place?

And Wii will be maxed out before PS360, which is the whole idea. Let's say Wii gets maxed out next year, that's when the games start to evolve, when we compare PS360, which gets maxed out a lot later. Maybe they even die out before that happens.

This wasn't about making innovative games, it was about making games with quality. As the SMG/TP example shows, you don't need to innovate in order to make games better. Of course, i do welcome innovation too.
Zack&Wiki hardly was innovative, if i've understood it correctly, it was just a return to a dead genre. Boom Blox may have been innovative (i haven't played the game), but very badly marketed (even by EA:s PR) and don't forget that Wii games are showing strong legs. It may end up having pretty good sales. And besides, how many innovative non-marketed new IP has been a blockbuster on PS360?

No, i don't agree. You said they play the Wii because of the controls.

So don't you read what people write or is your reading comprehension so bad? People are telling you that since the devs can't compete in flashier graphics, they need to compete with games quality. And other thing that people here tell is, that since the publishers wants to make money, they need to jump to the "gameplay ship" and Wii.