brute on 02 August 2008
Now ive noticed that GR(gamerankings) and MC(medacritic) have different scores for the sites that use grade sytems,for example:1UP has given SoulCalibur4 an A,now at metactritic its counted as 100% but on GameRankings its counted as 95%(which i think in this case GameRankings is correct) cause 1UP goes up to A+.Now the second thing is GameRevolution,it gave(lets use SMG on this)an A and on MetaCritic it is once again 100%,but on GameRankings its 95% which in this case MetaCritic is correct since GameRevolution goes up to A.
why is this a difference in them,is this a thing that is proving the broken review system(i think in some cases it is broken)
tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"
