| Onimusha12 said: Nintendo held back the bulk of its announcements because it didn't want its announcements competing with those of the 360 and PS3. It's common sense really, pick and choose the terms of the battle. |
Sooo... Your saying that the number one company that cant keep its consoles or big games ON SHELVES would worry about the other two had to announce? I can see the meeting..
"Hey, we really should announce all these amazing games we have."
"No no, Sony or Microsoft might announce something that will make it so our fans dont think about us."
"..... HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!111 IT PRINTS MONEY!!!1!1 We're King of the world!! Almost double their combined install base!! They could announce Metal Gear Halo Turismo as a joint cross platform game and our latest Petz game would bury it in media attention!!"
I doubt thats their idea. Plus they announced all games being released on the Wii for this year. To call it lack luster is an understatment. http://wii.qj.net/E3-2008-Wii-games-release-schedule-for-the-rest-of-2008/pg/49/aid/122234
I own all three current consoles and a great gaming rig, now thats out of the way.
This space Reserved for the Nuggets of Wisdom dropped by Bladeforce:
"Why post something like this when all it will get is PS3 owners blinded to reality replying? BOTH THE PS3 AND BLUE-RAY WILL NOT LAST 3 YEARS! TECHNOLOGY CHANGED TOO FAST!"
"is it Wii FIt that has sold as many as PS3's sold? Thats a LOL Look at the total sales of software is it just me that sees Nintendo titles hitting 10m+ and you say they arent making a difference? Another LOL!"
"Hell, with all the negative hype Sony spin, people just aren't interested cost is too high and to get the true HD experience (1080p, 7.1 surround) you will need a $1000+ system. THAT IS GOING TO DO IT IN A RECESSION! PS4 will not happen"
