By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Gaming Discussion - Should i get Modern Warfare 2 for PC or PS3?

 

Should i get Modern Warfare 2 for PC or PS3?

PS3 74 61.67%
 
PC 26 21.67%
 
OMG WTF!! XBOX 360!! 20 16.67%
 
Total:120
ps3_jrpg_gamer on 05 January 2010
vlad321 said:
ps3_jrpg_gamer said:
vlad321 said:
BladeOfGod said:
i see this thread is filled with PC gamer arrogance. it happanes a lot lately.

ps3_jrpg_gamer dont argue with them about it. They will never accept that some people think that something on consoles is better than on PC. Its either their opinnion or no opinnion at all

See, if you had said that platformers handle better with controllers, or that the Wii is really good at plug-and-play, or that consoles are idiot-proof, or several other claims I would have agreed with you. However you go and claim the biggest bullshit ever, like analogs > KBM for FPSes... Or did you see the monthly "which console game will look ebtter than Crysis" thread? I'm not a fanboy, I'm a realist.

 

P.S. Did you install the UT2004 demo or do you agree you will get your ass whooped and to shut up about FPS control schemes?


i was a guy that thought real-time strategy games like Age of Empires are only playable for PC then played Civiliztion Revolution then everything changed i saw how fool i was and so goes for every genre everyone believes different things and you should accept it

And you are still a fool because Civilization Revolution is not a real-time strategy game.

It's also like 1/20th (my biased estimate, it's probably only 1/10th) of Civilization 4 in terms of quality, so even in that regard it's a huge failure.

Edit:

To quote Wikipedia:

"For the console version, the gameplay has been streamlined and simplified to make the game easier to play."

In oher words. No they did NOT make a Civilization game on a console that plays alright. They made a shitty game work on a console, but that's about it.
my mistake turn-based and so AoE is THAT DOESN 'T CHANGE IT


Around the Network
vlad321 on 05 January 2010
ps3_jrpg_gamer said:
vlad321 said:
ps3_jrpg_gamer said:
vlad321 said:
BladeOfGod said:
i see this thread is filled with PC gamer arrogance. it happanes a lot lately.

ps3_jrpg_gamer dont argue with them about it. They will never accept that some people think that something on consoles is better than on PC. Its either their opinnion or no opinnion at all

See, if you had said that platformers handle better with controllers, or that the Wii is really good at plug-and-play, or that consoles are idiot-proof, or several other claims I would have agreed with you. However you go and claim the biggest bullshit ever, like analogs > KBM for FPSes... Or did you see the monthly "which console game will look ebtter than Crysis" thread? I'm not a fanboy, I'm a realist.

 

P.S. Did you install the UT2004 demo or do you agree you will get your ass whooped and to shut up about FPS control schemes?


i was a guy that thought real-time strategy games like Age of Empires are only playable for PC then played Civiliztion Revolution then everything changed i saw how fool i was and so goes for every genre everyone believes different things and you should accept it

And you are still a fool because Civilization Revolution is not a real-time strategy game.

It's also like 1/20th (my biased estimate, it's probably only 1/10th) of Civilization 4 in terms of quality, so even in that regard it's a huge failure.

Edit:

To quote Wikipedia:

"For the console version, the gameplay has been streamlined and simplified to make the game easier to play."

In oher words. No they did NOT make a Civilization game on a console that plays alright. They made a shitty game work on a console, but that's about it.
i played Civilization Revo and i believe it has more fun on ps3 than PC and was overall better

 

You should buy a Wii and Wii music. That should be right up your alley then.

I too am out of here... blind fanboys are thicker than flies on honey here....



Tag(thx fkusumot) - "Yet again I completely fail to see your point..."

HD vs Wii, PC vs HD: http://www.vgchartz.com/forum/thread.php?id=93374

Why Regenerating Health is a crap game mechanic: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=3986420

gamrReview's broken review scores: http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=4170835

 

Adobo on 05 January 2010

PS3 always win on VGchartz so...



ps3_jrpg_gamer on 05 January 2010
vlad321 said:
ps3_jrpg_gamer said:
vlad321 said:
ps3_jrpg_gamer said:
vlad321 said:
BladeOfGod said:
i see this thread is filled with PC gamer arrogance. it happanes a lot lately.

ps3_jrpg_gamer dont argue with them about it. They will never accept that some people think that something on consoles is better than on PC. Its either their opinnion or no opinnion at all

See, if you had said that platformers handle better with controllers, or that the Wii is really good at plug-and-play, or that consoles are idiot-proof, or several other claims I would have agreed with you. However you go and claim the biggest bullshit ever, like analogs > KBM for FPSes... Or did you see the monthly "which console game will look ebtter than Crysis" thread? I'm not a fanboy, I'm a realist.

 

P.S. Did you install the UT2004 demo or do you agree you will get your ass whooped and to shut up about FPS control schemes?


i was a guy that thought real-time strategy games like Age of Empires are only playable for PC then played Civiliztion Revolution then everything changed i saw how fool i was and so goes for every genre everyone believes different things and you should accept it

And you are still a fool because Civilization Revolution is not a real-time strategy game.

It's also like 1/20th (my biased estimate, it's probably only 1/10th) of Civilization 4 in terms of quality, so even in that regard it's a huge failure.

Edit:

To quote Wikipedia:

"For the console version, the gameplay has been streamlined and simplified to make the game easier to play."

In oher words. No they did NOT make a Civilization game on a console that plays alright. They made a shitty game work on a console, but that's about it.
i played Civilization Revo and i believe it has more fun on ps3 than PC and was overall better

 

You should buy a Wii and Wii music. That should be right up your alley then.

I too am out of here... blind fanboys are thicker than flies on honey here....
THAT SUITS YOU PERFECT

 



BladeOfGod on 05 January 2010
vlad321 said:
BladeOfGod said:
vlad321 said:
BladeOfGod said:
i see this thread is filled with PC gamer arrogance. it happanes a lot lately.

ps3_jrpg_gamer dont argue with them about it. They will never accept that some people think that something on consoles is better than on PC. Its either their opinnion or no opinnion at all

See, if you had said that platformers handle better with controllers, or that the Wii is really good at plug-and-play, or that consoles are idiot-proof, or several other claims I would have agreed with you. However you go and claim the biggest bullshit ever, like analogs > KBM for FPSes... Or did you see the monthly "which console game will look ebtter than Crysis" thread? I'm not a fanboy, I'm a realist and realistically, the KBM is better than controllers for FPS games.

 

P.S. Did you install the UT2004 demo or do you agree you will get your ass whooped and to shut up about FPS control schemes?
Main Entry: opin·ion
Pronunciation: ə-ˈpin-yən
Function: noun
Etymology: Middle English, from Anglo-French, from Latin opinion-, opinio, from opinari
Date: 14th century

1 a : a view, judgment, or appraisal formed in the mind about a particular matter

 

I know its hard to believe, but in some people's OPINION, analogs are better than mouse and keybord for FPSs.

 

 

I hate UT series

This isn't about opinions. Opinions have to deal with morals, gameplay, ethics etc. etc.

The control scheme being better is a FACT. You don't argue with a fact.

In my experience 100% of people who hate UT and Quake are ones who are at the bottoom 25% of the boards. Those 2 games are also the best measures of personal skill. Gald we agree you are bad at FPSes.


Some people think control scheme is better on a controller than on mouse, because its more fun that way. I am one of those people and that's mine opinnion. NOT a fact

 

I love Quake series though, especially Quake 3, but i hated Quake 4 though. Quake 3 >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Quake 4



Around the Network
Majin-Tenshinhan on 06 January 2010
ps3_jrpg_gamer said:
Majin-Tenshinhan said:
BladeOfGod said:
i see this thread is filled with PC gamer arrogance. it happanes a lot lately.

ps3_jrpg_gamer dont argue with them about it. They will never accept that SOME people think that something on consoles is better than on PC. Its either their opinnion or no opinnion at all

I'm a console gamer, actually.

 

That has absolutely no relevance to my post. He said PC gamer arrogance, I pointed out that I'm actually not a PC gamer at all.

Better luck next time.