vlad321 said:
ps3_jrpg_gamer said:
vlad321 said:
BladeOfGod said:
i see this thread is filled with PC gamer arrogance. it happanes a lot lately.
ps3_jrpg_gamer dont argue with them about it. They will never accept that some people think that something on consoles is better than on PC. Its either their opinnion or no opinnion at all |
See, if you had said that platformers handle better with controllers, or that the Wii is really good at plug-and-play, or that consoles are idiot-proof, or several other claims I would have agreed with you. However you go and claim the biggest bullshit ever, like analogs > KBM for FPSes... Or did you see the monthly "which console game will look ebtter than Crysis" thread? I'm not a fanboy, I'm a realist.
P.S. Did you install the UT2004 demo or do you agree you will get your ass whooped and to shut up about FPS control schemes?
|
i was a guy that thought real-time strategy games like Age of Empires are only playable for PC then played Civiliztion Revolution then everything changed i saw how fool i was and so goes for every genre everyone believes different things and you should accept it
|
And you are still a fool because Civilization Revolution is not a real-time strategy game.
It's also like 1/20th (my biased estimate, it's probably only 1/10th) of Civilization 4 in terms of quality, so even in that regard it's a huge failure.
Edit:
To quote Wikipedia:
"For the console version, the gameplay has been streamlined and simplified to make the game easier to play."
In oher words. No they did NOT make a Civilization game on a console that plays alright. They made a shitty game work on a console, but that's about it.
|
my mistake turn-based and so AoE is THAT DOESN 'T CHANGE IT
Essay Pro