By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Nintendo Discussion - Nintendo has lost the core market this generation

Alterego-X said:
ShadowSoldier said:

http://www.vgchartz.com/games/game.php?id=18524&region=All

Deca Sports- 50 on metacritc

 

http://www.vgchartz.com/games/game.php?id=7221&region=All

Carnival Games-56 on metacritc

 

http://www.vgchartz.com/games/game.php?id=6091&region=All

Mario Party 8- 62 on metacritic

 

http://www.vgchartz.com/games/game.php?id=24657&region=All

Wii Music- 63 on metacritc

Anything under 70= Shovelware 

Apparently, Kane & Lynch(67), Too Human(65), or Turok(69) are shovelware... 

 

OR... Shovelware actually means games from cheap developers, with zero efforts in the game's development.

 

 

Yeah the bolded are shovelware and so are all the games that fall under that category



Black Women Are The Most Beautiful Women On The Planet.

"In video game terms, RPGs are games that involve a form of separate battles taking place with a specialized battle system and the use of a system that increases your power through a form of points.

Sure, what you say is the definition, but the connotation of RPGs is what they are in video games." - dtewi

Around the Network
Dr.Grass said:
Jeez there's some super-emo posts on here.

I think Nintendo fans have a right to feel slightly disappointed, but some of these over the top HOW-COULD-YOU-NINTENDO posts are just rediculous.

They did say their not competing didn't they? They did say their not willing to lose money on a console didn't they? They did give us Mario,Link,Samus didn't they?

I CAN'T remember the last time I heard anyone say it, so here goes:
xxxxx****WELL DONE NINTENDO****xxxxxx

 

****WELL DONE NINTENDO**** 

 

 

Problem is, some Sony/MIcrosoft fanboys are quite annoying, but some Nintendo fanboys are even worse... many kids these days are just too spoiled, and think the whole world turns around their very important person... "i want this, i want that, i deserve this, i deserve that"...

Or even worse: "Nintendo should do this, or do that to be successful"... as if a successful and multi-billion dollar company like Nintendo could use the "deep thoughts" of kids who couldn't manage a hot-dog stand for two weeks without going bankrupt...

 



 

"A beautiful drawing in 480i will stay beautiful forever...

and an ugly drawing in 1080p will stay ugly forever..."

gansito said:
Nintendo hasn't lost anything, they expanded their market and gained more sales in the process. They have released great 1st party games, the problem is the perception that most nintendo fans have, that they expect a nintendo console to have great third party games, which hasn't happened to nintendo since the SNES, and they always are so hopeful that things will change, and when they don't they complain. The reason to buy a wii is to play nintendo games, other than that the HD consoles is where gaming is at.

Absolutely! You would have to be seriously delousional to think a series like Dragon Quest, Monster Hunter, Guitar Hero, Rock Band, Madden, Call of Duty, Tales of *, Final Fantasy or any other big series would think of jumping ship to a Nintendo console. No third party in their right mind would make any of the iterations of those series exclusive to the system either. It would be flushing money away. How can you expect any multiplatform game like Sonic Unleashed to ever sell more on a Nintendo platform?



Starcraft 2 ID: Gnizmo 229

Nintendo already tried the powerful core focused console (the GameCube) but it didn't work. If they did the same, would you think it would be better or worse? I think it would be the latter. Wii sold so many consoles and Ninty was able to care for BOTH casual and core gamers. I think they're doing better than ever.

I like Ninty because no matter what, they have the best first party games and I buy their consoles just for that. For Mario, Zelda and even Wii Sports is fun to play.

I really don't understand some gamers. It just seems like you hate Nintendo and nothing they would do would make you happy. Why do you bother whining all the time is boyond my comprehension. Just drop it already and play with w/e console you like.



ShadowSoldier said:
Onimusha12 said:
ShadowSoldier said:
Onimusha12 said:

Let’s face it, Sony and MS steam roll us with game after game for their consoles, show developer after developer willing to bend over backwards for them, show great things they plan to do for their new upcoming gaming peripherals. Meanwhile no one seriously gave wii motion controls a real effort… and Nintendo just plugs along…

Despite all their setbacks it’s clear that Microsoft and Sony are infinitely more adept at adapting to setbacks and re-training market focus to their favor. They’re making lemonade from lemons and damn tasty lemonade at that.

Basically everything that Wii gamers had claimed would happen for the Wii back in 2006/2007 has happened for the PS3. The Wii would eventually win over the core gamer, but it was the PS3 that is slowly doing so. The Wii has loads of quality games on the way, but it is only the PS3 that has delivered on delayed quality this generation.

While this generation is a lost cause for Nintendo in regards to core gaming, there is hope for the next gen, assuming Nintendo is smart enough to give the consumer what they want. We’ve already seen Nintendo dump massive amounts of revenue into new studios for developers and create a sub-company dedicated towards quality control. However…

From the outset, Nintendo faced many problems this generation:

-         Developers entered this generation not wanting to seriously support Nintendo.

-         Nintendo worked poorly with third party developers and failed to back third party titles.

-         Nintendo failed to diversify their image and product appeal, relying too heavily on casual gaming.

-         Nintendo did not cultivate the Wii to be a console geared towards selling a variety of software.

-         Nintendo was not prepared for the success of the Wii, lacked the infrastructure and second party studios to create a software snowball effect that is needed to get any console to become a viable software selling machine

In the end, its largely Nintendo’s inability to please third party developers and create a product that will sell their games. Nintendo can recover from this, but while gaining considerable ground this generation, they’ve lost their golden opportunity to take the market back, assuming that was even possible given their inbound handicap.

Nintendo needs to learn from Microsoft and Sony or they’ll end up losing the casual market to them too in due time. Nintendo needs to be willing to pay money out of their own pockets to get quality third party games put on their console.

While I’m sure some of you are just content with the way things are going for the Wii and DS, there are those of us who see that Nintendo can do more.

I 100% Agree. People say the core abandoned Nintendo? Not true especially during the Gamecube/N64 era it was the core gamer that kept them afloat. I find it ironic that it was Nintendo who invented the quality assurance seal during the NES days and today they have mostly shovelware doing exceptionally well on their system.


Except Shovelware sells terribly on the Wii

@ Soriku

You're right honestly, this is basially a day late and a dollar short summation.

http://www.vgchartz.com/games/game.php?id=18524&region=All

Deca Sports- 50 on metacritc

 

http://www.vgchartz.com/games/game.php?id=7221&region=All

Carnival Games-56 on metacritc

 

http://www.vgchartz.com/games/game.php?id=6091&region=All

Mario Party 8- 62 on metacritic

 

http://www.vgchartz.com/games/game.php?id=24657&region=All

Wii Music- 63 on metacritc

Anything under 70= Shovelware 

A pretty lame rule. Critics are "core" so of course the scores are going to be low for these games. I've played all these games and the only one I'd consider shovelware is Deca Sports.



Around the Network
68soul said:
...

Wii userbase has already a 5 million "Zelda userbase", and these 5 millions of gamers ONLY are already enough to justify the creation of some epic adventure games... when there are 10 millions of Halo buyers, a console is "hardcore", but when there are 5 millions of Zelda buyers, it is not "hardcore at all"? What do you want me to say? They're lame, and they spit on the face of Nintendo's core userbase...

...

I doubt it's that easy: look at Okami. That's a high-quality, very Zelda-like, 60 hours+ epic adventure game. It wasn't exactly bought in droves by the "Zelda userbase".

Were the potential buyers thrown off by the peculiar art style? Maybe. Were its sales dampened by it being a re-release of a PS2 game? Most probably. But still, the ratio between its sales and the potential market are probably not encouraging for somone wanting to venture in the same direction. You heard the developers lamenting so many times that the Nintendo core crowd is a tough one to crack, or in lame whining terms "they only buy Nintendo games".



"All you need in life is ignorance and confidence; then success is sure." - Mark Twain

"..." - Gordon Freeman

WereKitten said:
68soul said:
...

Wii userbase has already a 5 million "Zelda userbase", and these 5 millions of gamers ONLY are already enough to justify the creation of some epic adventure games... when there are 10 millions of Halo buyers, a console is "hardcore", but when there are 5 millions of Zelda buyers, it is not "hardcore at all"? What do you want me to say? They're lame, and they spit on the face of Nintendo's core userbase...

...

I doubt it's that easy: look at Okami. That's a high-quality, very Zelda-like, 60 hours+ epic adventure game. It wasn't exactly bought in droves by the "Zelda userbase".

Were the potential buyers thrown off by the peculiar art style? Maybe.

I think it was more that people weren't familiar with the game, playing is believing, and not many people got their hands on Okami and got to try it out, Zelda is a known commodity, Okami not so much, companies should take some of that marketing money, and just drive around in trucks showing of their games, putting controllers into the hands of people.



 

Predictions:Sales of Wii Fit will surpass the combined sales of the Grand Theft Auto franchiseLifetime sales of Wii will surpass the combined sales of the entire Playstation family of consoles by 12/31/2015 Wii hardware sales will surpass the total hardware sales of the PS2 by 12/31/2010 Wii will have 50% marketshare or more by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!!  It was a little over 48% only)Wii will surpass 45 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2008 (I was wrong!!  Nintendo Financials showed it fell slightly short of 45 million shipped by end of 2008)Wii will surpass 80 Million in lifetime sales by the end of 2009 (I was wrong!! Wii didn't even get to 70 Million)

I qualify as a hardcore gamer, but I hate the term. I'm ashamed of HC gamers and how awful they make gamers look. How ignorant they are. How arrogant and myopic. gaming industry does not resolve around you... its for everyone



The truth is, 3rd parties have been doing fantastic on the Wii. It's just that they've done so by following the non-gamer audience that Wii is focused on. Hence the games that they sell generally are not appealing to most of the people on this forum.

And of course the notion that 3rd parties have some kind of massive conspiracy to destroy Nintendo is preposterous. I bet they all meet in an underground lair and sing odes to Sony and Microsoft while burning pictures of Mario.

Complete nonsense.



WereKitten said:
68soul said:
...

Wii userbase has already a 5 million "Zelda userbase", and these 5 millions of gamers ONLY are already enough to justify the creation of some epic adventure games... when there are 10 millions of Halo buyers, a console is "hardcore", but when there are 5 millions of Zelda buyers, it is not "hardcore at all"? What do you want me to say? They're lame, and they spit on the face of Nintendo's core userbase...

...

I doubt it's that easy: look at Okami. That's a high-quality, very Zelda-like, 60 hours+ epic adventure game. It wasn't exactly bought in droves by the "Zelda userbase".

Were the potential buyers thrown off by the peculiar art style? Maybe.

 

You're right, and it wasn't easier with the PS2 120 million+ userbase... and i think it did better on Wii anyway, so...

But things are what they are: some games just don't have the appeal to be mass market games... some artistic directions and level designs don't please most gamers out there, even more when it's a very japanese-oriented art direction...

And that's what i was tellin' in my first post in this thread: "niche" games will often please only 200.000 or 300.000 people... but with the very high HD dev' costs now, these "niche" games won't have the green light anymore: it's like they don't have the right to exist anymore...

And then, what would be left? FPS on one side, Nintendo games on another, and sports/music games everywhere? No room for RPGS, action/adventure, platformers, puzzle games? No originality, no new gameplay, no new controls, no new IPs, and sequels of famous franchises only, in a very risk-averse industry? This would be the day i'd quit gaming, then...

 

 



 

"A beautiful drawing in 480i will stay beautiful forever...

and an ugly drawing in 1080p will stay ugly forever..."