By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Sony Discussion - PS3 forecasts: Setting the record straight, wondering about their Q2 report

libellule said:
I dont see why u say it is impossible.

8M consoles in 9 months ? why not ?

same for the shippements...

who knows which production level they can reach ?

If you can't believe that Sony can produce and ship that many; than you can't believe that Wii will produce and ship more.



"We'll toss the dice however they fall,
And snuggle the girls be they short or tall,
Then follow young Mat whenever he calls,
To dance with Jak o' the Shadows."

Check out MyAnimeList and my Game Collection. Owner of the 5 millionth post.

Around the Network
KruzeS said:
NJ5 said:

Just for completeness, let's think about the possibility that we're wrong and they do mean 11 million with the old counting method:

I'm sorry, but you probably are wrong.

You make a forecast saying you'll run 11 miles till the end of the month. The following week you say: "I'm going metric, but I still mantain my forecast". What does that mean? That you'll just run 11 km? No, because that would be changing your forecast. If all they say about the forecast is that they're keeping it, you can't just go and change the units.

But hey, think what you want. This is all just a ploy from Sony after all.


Effectively that's what they said. They said both things, that they're keeping the forecast and that they're using a new metric for what the forecast is about. There's an ambiguity here, but judging from their declarations I'd say they are going to use the new metric exclusively from now on.

And yes, no matter whether I'm wrong on this point or not, the forecast is still misleading...

EDIT - as for your analogy, it would be more accurate if you had said:

You make a forecast saying you'll run 11 miles till the end of the month. The following week you say: "I'm going to change how I count a mile, but I still mantain my forecast".

That's much more similar to Sony's statements. Doesn't look so clear now, does it?

 



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

libellule said:

this thread is about the feasability of producing + shipping lot of console in a restricted time ?

or it is about the risk of producing to much console that will produce more stock if the console doesnt sell enought ?

This thread is about numbers and forecasts. The rest is discussion, you can discuss whatever you want based on the numbers...

 



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

NJ5 said:

Effectively that's what they said. They said both things, that they're keeping the forecast and that they're using a new metric for what the forecast is about. There's an ambiguity here, but judging from their declarations I'd say they are going to use the new metric exclusively from now on.

Then please show us that. No quote you have presented here, and absolutely nothing on the report, has the method and the forecast in the same sentence or even near each other. The forecast is mentioned only in passing in the report, and only ever speaks of revenue, income, etc - never units sold or shipped. The only thing they do say is that it's unchanged, and as you've openly stated here, your interpretation implies a covert change (which would configure a crime).



Reality has a Nintendo bias.
KruzeS said:
NJ5 said:

Effectively that's what they said. They said both things, that they're keeping the forecast and that they're using a new metric for what the forecast is about. There's an ambiguity here, but judging from their declarations I'd say they are going to use the new metric exclusively from now on.

Then please show us that. No quote you have presented here, and absolutely nothing on the report, has the method and the forecast in the same sentence or even near each other. The forecast is mentioned only in passing in the report, and only ever speaks of revenue, income, etc - never units sold or shipped. The only thing they do say is that it's unchanged, and as you've openly stated here, your interpretation implies a covert change (which would configure a crime).


OK, what about this? Quote by San Levenson, Senior Vice President, Investor Relations of Sony Corporation of America. Emphasis mine:

As you may have notice, we’ve the actual unit disclosure for hardware and software from production shipments to [sell-in]. We’ve also done this for the unit forecast for each game platform. The result, however, is no change in the forecast figures. PS2 hardware unit sales are expected to be 10 million units, PSP hardware unit sales are expected to be 9 million units, and PS3 hardware unit sales are expected to be 11 million units.

I actually hadn't noticed this quote before, and I believe it settles it?

SOURCE: http://seekingalpha.com/article/42544

 



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

Around the Network
NJ5 said:

I actually hadn't noticed this quote before, and I believe it settles it?

Yes, that does it. Thank you.

But on another note... they're crazy. I mean... 10 million to retailers in 3 quarters? Retailers that already have 600 thousand in stock? That will simply refuse to carry more than 2 million stock after Christmas? They couldn't pull that one off, even if it sold another 8 million to consumers till the end of the calendar year.



Reality has a Nintendo bias.
KruzeS said:
NJ5 said:

I actually hadn't noticed this quote before, and I believe it settles it?

Yes, that does it. Thank you.

But on another note... they're crazy. I mean... 10 million to retailers in 3 quarters? Retailers that already have 600 thousand in stock? That will simply refuse to carry more than 2 million stock after Christmas? They couldn't pull that one off, even if it sold another 8 million to consumers till the end of the calendar year.


Thank you for pushing me to find the definitive proof ;)

Yes, they are crazy. Maybe they're planning to gradually drop the forecast in the Q2 and Q3 reports? If they don't, it will certainly backfire when they publish their final fiscal year report...

Knowing how they always seem to choose the most stupid alternative, I'm betting on the latter. Or at least, I'd say they won't change it in the Q2 report, because "come on, Christmas is coming, why would we drop the sales forecast now?".

 



My Mario Kart Wii friend code: 2707-1866-0957

wow.

nice reply NJ5 btw, nice to see all the numbers put together, and although it means sony will have 2 million less units in stock by March, they will still have a lot, and a lot will still be with retailers i think (assuming the retailers overstock through christmas, or overestimate after christmas demand).

and i made those estimates with a 'minimum not sold' number so the minimum not sold by then is likely to be 4 million, with at least 3 million of those still held by Sony.
in my opinion they won't have 10.5 million consoles sold by March though, more like 9-9.5. (8-8.5 million after christmas)



The result, however, is no change in the forecast figures.

They're telling people they're down-revising their forecast, and then they go out of their way to say they're no change in their forecast figures which *sounds* like a contradiction if you don't understand what is happening. The biggest issue is that investors would have to go back and dig up the old numbers in order to find out how the forecast was revised, because they're doing it indirectly.

Sony should have said, "So our total-shipped forecast for '08 will is down by 2 million units."  Or they should have said, "We will retroactively apply these to our previous numbers and the new 'shipped' figure is down to 3.6 million for fiscal '07 from 5.5 million."

I guess the end result is that they've decreased their forecast by approximately 2 million units. This is certainly going in the right direction, and if they have another disappointing quarter even with Lair and Heavenly Sword and whatever else is coming out this quarter, they'll likely decrease their forecast again. And they'd have to if they weren't ramping up their production by then.



TheBigFatJ said:

They're telling people they're down-revising their forecast, and then they go out of their way to say they're no change in their forecast figures which *sounds* like a contradiction if you don't understand what is happening.

Except they aren't really. Expecting to sell 11 million units (even if only to retail) for the fiscal year, when they already began with units in the channel, and had a dismal first quarter, is far more ambitious than just shipping them (as in prodution shipments). They could always pille up more units (they were already holding to 2 million, why not more?), and actually they might have to, if they already were into long term production contracts. But selling 11 million... there's a limit to how much you can force retailers to hold on to, specially after Christmas.



Reality has a Nintendo bias.