By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - PC Discussion - ATI is back at the top!

who would run a game at 2560x1400? how much money would you have to spend on a monitor that would even show it?



Around the Network

the only thing that stops me from buying ati cards is that they have poor driver support. or has that changed



obieslut said:
the only thing that stops me from buying ati cards is that they have poor driver support. or has that changed

 

its a toss-up but really nVidia is a bit better due to Linux driver support.



PC gaming is better than console gaming. Always.     We are Anonymous, We are Legion    Kick-ass interview   Great Flash Series Here    Anime Ratings     Make and Play Please
Amazing discussion about being wrong
Official VGChartz Folding@Home Team #109453
 
cwbys21 said:
who would run a game at 2560x1400? how much money would you have to spend on a monitor that would even show it?

I think that might be a misprint.  Maybe it's 2560x1600?

Many vendors sell monitors that have that for a native resolution.

I'd buy ATI if they would get their linux drivers sorted out.  (well, I did just get a SLI board...so no ATI for me for a while )

 



epsilon72 said:
cwbys21 said:
who would run a game at 2560x1400? how much money would you have to spend on a monitor that would even show it?

I think that might be a misprint. Maybe it's 2560x1600?

Many vendors sell monitors that have that for a native resolution.

I'd buy ATI if they would get their linux drivers sorted out. (well, I did just get a SLI board...so no ATI for me for a while )

 

and for that price i would expect it to be made out of solid gold

 



Around the Network
ssj12 said:
683017CA said:
WOW THOSE SPECS ARE UNHEARD OF 2GB CARD DAMN!!!!

 

its two 4870s on one PCB... why woouldnt it have 2GBs?

 

anyways, still under impressed, crossfireX support sucks but for some ars reason the 4870X2 + 4870 = good. WTF???????

 

Wait for nVidia to release their next card. Think the GT280 was powerful for a card, you can get for under $400, then just wait.

That sounds like a Sony PR statment, just wait, please...

Still I doubt a lot of nVidia lately, they have so many issues, with chipsets, integrated graphics, discrete gpus, and now the power is not enoug to keep the high prices, maybe the next gen will be better, maybe...

 



By me:

Made with Blender + LuxRender
"Since you can´t understand ... there is no point to taking you seriously."

soon i will get a new graphics card,but im not sure which to get,i need to see some footage of this



tag:"reviews only matter for the real hardcore gamer"

FJ-Warez said:
ssj12 said:
683017CA said:
WOW THOSE SPECS ARE UNHEARD OF 2GB CARD DAMN!!!!

 

its two 4870s on one PCB... why woouldnt it have 2GBs?

 

anyways, still under impressed, crossfireX support sucks but for some ars reason the 4870X2 + 4870 = good. WTF???????

 

Wait for nVidia to release their next card. Think the GT280 was powerful for a card, you can get for under $400, then just wait.

That sounds like a PR statment, just wait, please...

fix'd

 



my pillars of gaming: kh, naughty dog, insomniac, ssb, gow, ff

i officially boycott boycotts.  crap.

Nice, wish I had the money for it >_>



MaxwellGT2000 - "Does the amount of times you beat it count towards how hardcore you are?"

Wii Friend Code - 5882 9717 7391 0918 (PM me if you add me), PSN - MaxwellGT2000, XBL - BlkKniteCecil, MaxwellGT2000

epsilon72 said:
cwbys21 said:
who would run a game at 2560x1400? how much money would you have to spend on a monitor that would even show it?

I think that might be a misprint.  Maybe it's 2560x1600?

Many vendors sell monitors that have that for a native resolution.

I'd buy ATI if they would get their linux drivers sorted out.  (well, I did just get a SLI board...so no ATI for me for a while )

 

 

yeah that was a typo, and $1000 for a monitor? damn.  the highest my settings for my monitor goes is 1280x1024