I guess we will start to see some Haze/Lair comparisons. It's a shame to see it end this way.... Fingers crossed for Duke Nukem

I don't think this game will be AAA, and I dont think it will be horrible.

But after the ridiculous bitchfest some of the sony fans (in this thread and elsewhere on the site) put on about Eurogamer's MGS4 rating, I don't think we'll be taking this mod's word as gospel.

Will Too Human sell more than 500 000 copies LTD?

Highly unlikey.I do hope for this game to be great though.

The game will probably end up being average/good (not great) overall. I like Kotaku for the links to game related stories, but I've never really bothered to read their reviews/previews. I think I'll wait until the other review sites/mags put up their reviews.

I don't think Silicon Knights have really done anything worthy of notice after Eternal Darkness

When Eurogamer gave 8/10 in an officially published review of MGS4, the pitchforks were out in droves, with a ton of criticism on the reviewer's credentials and credibility.

And then we get this post in the Eurogamer forum from a practically unknown mod and its 100% credible to some of you?

Why am I not surprised....

@Starcraft - I agree that Eurogamer is not to be trusted. The problem with Too Human is that many publications are starting to give negative impressions and the themes are similar. Horrible camera system, problems with the combat controls, uneven graphics, unskippable cut-scenes/death animations....

The problem with the Edge and Eurogamer reviews is they were so out of step with other main stream sites. This is demonstrated in MGS4's metacritic rating of 95.

u can notice the frame rate problem in gameplay videos.

PS3 had LAIR, Wii had Sonic & Secret Rings... now the 360 gets Too Human. Just the way its meant to be...