This could have hold true until Bristol Ridge, but then with Raven Ridge the jump should have been bigger than just going up to 10 NCU.

I'm not just comparing raw bandwith. While I didn't mention it, I'm also taking the clock speeds and GCN evolutions into account. The GPU Clock in the APUs have risen substantially since Trinty (I'm leaving out Llano because it's VLIW5 design isn't really comparable with it's successors). Trinity came with 800Mhz VLIW 4, Kaveri with 866Mhz GCN 2 and Bristol Ridge pushed it to 1108Mhz GCN 3. That's a roughly 40% increase in clock speed and over 60% increase in performance and hence throughput without increasing the actual number of Compute Units. So while I believe the number of CU will only increase by 60%, the performance and throughput should rise at the same time by about 100%, if not more. I'm expecting those 16CU to run at close to 1500Mhz for instance and the GCN being much more performant by that time as they are now.

Yeah nah. People claiming 3-4GB of Ram for the PS4 isn't as outlandish as claiming next gen is going to have 128GB.
I think you seem to be conflating the fact that... The technology existed for the Playstation 4 to economically have 8GB of Ram... The technology is NOT going to exist for consoles to economically have 128GB of Ram.
I tend to be correct on my predictions on technology that ends up in consoles... If you care to read back on the Xbox One, Playstation 4, Xbox One X, Playstation 4 Pro and the Nintendo Switch.

Besides. The Playstation 4 *was* only going to have 4GB of memory at one point. Even the developer kits only had 4GB.
https://www.videogamer.com/news/ps4s-8gb-ram-was-kept-secret-from-third-party-devs-until-console-reveal

Why? Because it wasn't untill 2013 that higher-density 4 Gb memory chips became available... In-case you aren't aware, the Playstation 4 uses 16 memory chips.
Which meant if they used the memory chips that were only half the density which was all that was available prior to 2013... Then the console would only have 4GB of Ram.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GDDR5_SDRAM#Commercial_implementation

8k is a bit far fetched when the base Playstation 4 struggles to obtain 1080P in every title... And the Playstation 4 Pro rarely hits 4k... And thus relies on various tricks to make a "fake" 4k image.

Besides. We are only in the starting phase of transitioning to 4k, 8k is a pipedream that is a long ways off... And we will also have 5k as the interim. (4x Quad HD anyway?)

I doubt VR is ever going to become a "thing". - Companies are closing, the games have been "meh" at best... And the price of entry has made it only viable for those who are genuinely interested in the technology.

Consoles and Content Creation? Nope.
Video editing with a console controller? Nope.
Multi-tasking like what you see on a PC using a controller? Nope.

The Xbox One tried multi-tasking, implemented features like snap, voice and gesture controls and so on.... It gets in the way of why you buy these devices to beging with... To play video games. Consequently, microsoft has been backtracking on it's multi-tasking features like snap on a quest to save more memory and processing.

Raven Ridge has 11 CU's.
11 x 64 = 704 shaders.
It should drive up the clock rates though.

And that is enough to compete with the Playstation 4, which is only GCN 1.0 (Albeit customized) and is regarded as inefficient by modern standards.

We have certainly come a long way since everyone was saying the Playstation 4 is the fastest platform to exist because no other platform has 8GB of GDDR5 Ram. :P

Yes im so ready to buy a new pc

Amd only has announced a Vega 10 and Vega 8 Raven Ridge yet, so with 10 and 8 CU. While it's rumored to have 11 CU, there haven't been any prrofs for this yet. Even then, the jump is too small compared to the win in space from the shrink from 28nm to 14nm to not being limited by something else. I doubt it's the TDP judging by the mobile polaris chip RX 480M, as that one has 16 CU with only 35W TDP. Which only leaves the bandwith, as that one can't feed more than that without starving them to death.

Enough to compete with the PS4? With XBO for sure, but for the PS4, at 11 CU it would nominally need a stable 1300Mhz clock speed to even just match the console.

While GCN 1 is pretty inefficient compared to GCN 4 (Polaris) and 5 (Vega), there's virtually no gain in base performance outside of new DX12 instructions which no game yet uses. An R7 260X (Bonaire, GCN 2) is virtually the same with the RX 460 (Baffin, GCN 4) when comparing the 2GiB models (I picked these cards as they are the most easely comparable, with same amount of CU, VRAM and even their clock speeds (only 10mhz difference) are almost the same) in DX 11 games. This shows that while GCN got more efficient over the years, the performance of the GCN Units hasn't changed much. So while Raven Ridge can be roughly on par with a PS4 in graphical prowess, it's not enough yet to outshine the console in that domain. My guess is about 1.5 TFlops, in between XBO and PS4 calculating power.

There have been leaked benchmarks, roadmaps and other information. There is a 50+ page thread over on Anandtech about it.

It's like when Zen, Bulldozer and Phenom CPU's were being leaked, people disregarded the information even though those leaks had a ton of supporting evidence/leaks and turned out to be legitimate.
When enough of something gets leaked from more than one source, you can start taking it seriously to a degree.

You are basing that on flops. I can elaborate on why that is not an accurate way to go about things. But do I really need to?

 Blatantly false.

GCN2 to GCN4 isn't the same as GCN1 to GCN5.

Again with the flops?