| Bofferbrauer2 said: Amd only has announced a Vega 10 and Vega 8 Raven Ridge yet, so with 10 and 8 CU. While it's rumored to have 11 CU, there haven't been any prrofs for this yet. |
There have been leaked benchmarks, roadmaps and other information. There is a 50+ page thread over on Anandtech about it.
It's like when Zen, Bulldozer and Phenom CPU's were being leaked, people disregarded the information even though those leaks had a ton of supporting evidence/leaks and turned out to be legitimate.
When enough of something gets leaked from more than one source, you can start taking it seriously to a degree.
| Bofferbrauer2 said: Enough to compete with the PS4? With XBO for sure, but for the PS4, at 11 CU it would nominally need a stable 1300Mhz clock speed to even just match the console. |
You are basing that on flops. I can elaborate on why that is not an accurate way to go about things. But do I really need to?
| Bofferbrauer2 said: While GCN 1 is pretty inefficient compared to GCN 4 (Polaris) and 5 (Vega), there's virtually no gain in base performance outside of new DX12 instructions which no game yet uses. |
Blatantly false.
| Bofferbrauer2 said: An R7 260X (Bonaire, GCN 2) is virtually the same with the RX 460 (Baffin, GCN 4) when comparing the 2GiB models (I picked these cards as they are the most easely comparable |
GCN2 to GCN4 isn't the same as GCN1 to GCN5.
| Bofferbrauer2 said: My guess is about 1.5 TFlops, in between XBO and PS4 calculating power. |
Again with the flops?
www.youtube.com/@Pemalite
