By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Kowan said:
Zekkyou said:

I don't believe we've ever been given specifics on the gender split for timelords in general, but individual timelords have been presented as usually favouring one or the other. The first time a timelord gender switch was mentioned was 2011 i think, and the first time it was shown (Hell Bent in 2015) it was implied to be somewhat of a surprise when it does happens. Doctor Who frequently retcons itself though, so maybe they'll decide it was common all along in series 11+.

Actually, they have shown several female Time Lords ever since way back. All inhabitants of Gallifrey are Time Lords, and there are women in Gallifrey, which means they are female Time Lords. Also Jenny, the Doctor's daughter is part time lord, Missy, the last incarnation of The Master is also a lady Time Lord(she was revealed way before Hell Bent. They didn't show her regeneration but it was obvious enough as she is The Master who was previously male).

more here:

http://doctorwho.answers.wikia.com/wiki/Are_there_any_female_Time_Lords

I think you've misread my comment. I didn't say there weren't any female timelords (in-fact i started off by noting we have no idea what the gender split is; we know there are some male and some female, but not the ratio), i was talking about the prevalence of gender switching. To the best of my knowledge 2011 is the first time it was ever brought up, and Hell Bent the first time is was actually shown on-screen. I brought the latter up because it allowed us to see the reaction of another timelord there, which was relevant to what i was saying (that the show has in recent years presented gender switching as a thing that does happen, but isn't the standard).



Around the Network
Zekkyou said:
Kowan said:

Actually, they have shown several female Time Lords ever since way back. All inhabitants of Gallifrey are Time Lords, and there are women in Gallifrey, which means they are female Time Lords. Also Jenny, the Doctor's daughter is part time lord, Missy, the last incarnation of The Master is also a lady Time Lord(she was revealed way before Hell Bent. They didn't show her regeneration but it was obvious enough as she is The Master who was previously male).

more here:

http://doctorwho.answers.wikia.com/wiki/Are_there_any_female_Time_Lords

I think you've misread my comment. I didn't say there weren't any female timelords (in-fact i started off by noting we have no idea what the gender split is; we know there are some male and some female, but not the ratio), i was talking about the prevalence of gender switching. To the best of my knowledge 2011 is the first time it was ever brought up, and Hell Bent the first time is was actually shown on-screen. I brought the latter up because it allowed us to see the reaction of another timelord there, which was relevant to what i was saying (that the show has in recent years presented gender switching as a thing that does happen, but isn't the standard).

No, I get it. I put my reply to your point in my Missy comment which is the first time in the revival series that they showed a Male TImelord turn into a woman time lord. There was no regeneration shown but there was a reaction from The Doctor(in realizing The Master is now a woman).



I think they caved to outside pressures.

I dislike race or sex changing characters. It hardly works. As far as i can remember all were disastrous except Nick fury because Samuel L Jackson is an icon. He could pull anything because he is cool outside the role.

Things like black human torch, female thor, etc. They just don't work. That isn't who the characters are, not to mention what a huge disrespect it is to their identity and legacy.

I'm sure i will still give it a chance, but i'm far from excited. This cave in to outside pressures will create a disconnect with the fans and the show runners that may spell disaster to the series.



Kowan said:
Zekkyou said:

I think you've misread my comment. I didn't say there weren't any female timelords (in-fact i started off by noting we have no idea what the gender split is; we know there are some male and some female, but not the ratio), i was talking about the prevalence of gender switching. To the best of my knowledge 2011 is the first time it was ever brought up, and Hell Bent the first time is was actually shown on-screen. I brought the latter up because it allowed us to see the reaction of another timelord there, which was relevant to what i was saying (that the show has in recent years presented gender switching as a thing that does happen, but isn't the standard).

No, I get it. I put my reply to your point in my Missy comment which is the first time in the revival series that they showed a Male TImelord turn into a woman time lord. There was no regeneration shown but there was a reaction from The Doctor(in realizing The Master is now a woman).

Ah, I think there was just a misunderstanding then. When i said "shown" i meant literally shown. Ignoring that though, while we do get an end-result reaction from the Doctor with Missy i didn't consider it relevant to my point. Not only is their general dynamic rather different from other timelords shown, i'm inclined to believe the majority of his initial shock was aimed more at her identity than it actually being a her. He was similarly shocked with the Professor Yana reveal.

In-show wise, i think the best reference points we have for personal gender bias with regeneration is the Doctor himself (who until now has been shown male 13 times and female now once), and the soldier timelord's fluttered reaction in Hell Bent. It's obviously far from conclusive though, and DW will make the cannon whatever it wants it to be :p



I'm not really much into Doctor Who, I have only watched maybe a dozen episodes, but this doesn't really seem like the right series to be complaining about a female replacement... I don't know, the entire series is about replacing actors. Just seems rather natural.



Around the Network
FloatingWaffles said:
 

I feel like the lore sometimes contradicts itself. Aren't regenerations supposed to be completely random? The 9th doctor even says before he regenerates that they never know what they're gonna end up with. But then there are also scenes such as where Peter Capaldi remembers his face from a previous episode with the 10th doctor and remembers why he "chose it", which would imply that they do have at least some sort of control over who they become?

So while it has always been said that the doctor can regenerate into anything it makes me wonder if they're going to try to give a reason for it that made him become a female this time where as he didn't during all his other regenerations or just go with "well we always said the doctor could become anything" that has been said and shown in the show before like with that one episode from series 9 where that one guy regenerated and come back as a woman.

To the bolded - it seems that way. Here's the regeneration of the Doctor's female Timelord companion Romana, way back when. I remember watching this, first time around.



Everytime I watch the separate intros of the series or watch the Sleeping Angels episodes I want to get into the series, but there seems to be no convenient way of watching it from the beginning and some of the Doctors i've seen are truly awful (cough cough Season 1 of the reboot)



I stopped watching the Who reboot during the Tennant era. It just felt like it was going nowhere, plus it was WAY cheesier than I expected. Maybe the series isn't for me. Good luck to the new Doctor tho.



So women can even be doctors now, huh.



If you demand respect or gratitude for your volunteer work, you're doing volunteering wrong.

I'm not a Doctor Who fan in the slightest, I don't watch the show (tried it, too mediocre for me sorry), but I'm would expect some sort of social justice inserted into the show. I wonder how fans will react. Has worked wonders for Marvel and their comics for example (sarcasm).