Because nothing says mending relationships between US citizens and Russia than a hacking in attempts to help further a far right authoritarian nominee (Trump in this case). /Rolls eyes

Big words from the guy who kills anyone who says anything negative about him

 The allegation is that he shared information from a source that did not give permission for the information to be shared. That is considered an important consideration in the intelligence community. It could put the source in danger. It could make the source angry and refuse to deal with us any longer, thus hurting our intelligence operations. Supposedly, information about the source is highly sensitive, to the point where the intelligence they gather could expose them. That probably means they are high enough rank to have access to protected information so losing them would be no laughing matter.

1. I wouldn't put it past him.

2. Probably not.

Theres no point man! It's a loss cause on this site. Unless you like being attacked for airing your opinion. 

It's sad that Russia and the rest of the world are making fun of the once mighty Americans becasue of political turmoil.

At least America won't have to worry about their enemies anymore, because it's being attacked from the inside. 

I think the current POTUS is the only one with political schizophrenia, thank you very much.

The president does has the right to share any and all information he is privy to because of his position.  The question is that the people who gave the US the intel would like to know who that intel is shared with in case it becomes a conflict of interest.  The fact that certain intel could put agents at risk or certain surveillance is the key issue.  Basically it comes down to ignorance.  The current administration never seek understanding before it does anything and we have seen that Trump is the king when it comes to just doing without thought or understanding.

On your second paragraph, where the heck did you get that opinion.  I do not remember any conservative American choosing Trump so that the US can have a less hostile relationship with Russia.

Maybe. But here in the USA everyone is innocent until proven guilty. Assumptions, no matter how "obvious" they may sound to you, do not count as proof. We can't impeach the President based on conjecture alone. If Putin thinks he has proof, then we should welcome it.

Proof of what? That he hosted the Russian ambassador and they didn't just sit in the room staring at each other for an hour? He gave us a general statement of what they discussed but didn't go into specifics and so we don't know what on that subject or any other subject they discussed. We also don't know if what they discussed was inapropriate (though he's the POTUS so apropriateness is almost irrelevent) but we do know that the people who have gone on record about this meeting have stated, he didn't talk about anything either not already public nor did he divulge anything inapropriately. 

I may, but someone still needs to balance things out.