You need more than the other, however many that might be. For a proper comparison, we'd have to count the (exclusive) features of both XBL and PSN.

That's what I'm saying.

But yes we would, they're 99% the same service so both sets of fans should be happy. 

ta-da you proved his point.

even if it were only one more, it's still more

to have a feature your competitor doesn't have =/= to have more features.

What's wrong ?

And I have to name the Xbox equivalent: Home sharing... 

Basically, your games are not necessarily tied to your bloody account, whereas in PSN, they are... Not to mention internet issues... 

https://www.gamefaqs.com/boards/691088-xbox-one/69825176

Also, Play Anywhere... 

Ahem...

"Xbox Live active users reached 55 million during the quarter. That’s a new record, and well up on the previous high of 49 million in mid 2016."

I have to remind those in here that one console isn't tied to a single user. The Xbox One is not the PS Mortem...

No, the exact same thing that is described in that forum link is also on PSN. You can have a primary console on PSN that allows other account to play the game on that console. Home Sharing is not the equivelent of Shareplay. Shareplay let's people use the games on your console over the internet, equally it also allows playing splitscreen games over the internet.

And the PSN equivelent of Play Anywhere would be cross-buy, cross-save and cross-play, though this will be a dead feature soon enough.

So streaming then... 

Also, if I recall correctly, this does allow a second PS console to have access to the same games as the first one. In other words, one account buys the games and as long as the account doesn't declare their newer system their home, the games from that account stay on both consoles... 

It sort of works like that... 

OP you should've posted the asterisk

* as measured by PR statements / active user