Jumpin said:
How are they being hostile? Are they threatening people with assault rifles and violence? Bombs? Hostages?
The article reads like a yellow press dramatization. "Hostile" is just a buzz word to make it sound more interesting, when it is otherwise a standard purchasing of shares on a publicly traded market.
|
Do you understand business terminology? Do you make comments without knowing what you talk about? Did you think that the Cold War was incorrectly named, since temperatures were not all that cold to warrant the name? Do you always take things literally?
A 'hostile' takeover in business lingo denotes a takeover that bypasses the company's management and goes directly after shares held by private shareholders. In other words, the management of the company do not necessarily have to want the takeover to take place, but as long as enough shareholders are convinced to sell, it can take place regardless of the wishes of the current administration/management. A 'non-hostile' takeover is one that happens with the agreement of the company's current management, without circumventing them as is the case of a 'hostile' takeover.