I want politicians to suck up their pride and all of them to work together for, oh I don't know, do what's best for the country?

That's my view, I doubt it has a name. I don't like politics.

Mostly libertarian, lean right, but not on environment and gun issues.

Generally, at least in America, I think the gov't is incredibly inefficient and only makes things worse/cost more. For instance, the health care debate. Both republicans and democrats are arguing about how much the govt should cover but not addressing the true issue - how overpriced health care is in america compared to the rest of the world. I wouldn't be against standard health care but not at the costs the gov't raises it to.

Healthcare is cheaper in other countries because they gov't enforces it to be. You pay more for healthcare because it's a for-profit business in the US. 

In the middle.

They are not on the opposite end of the spectrum. Anarchism originated as a left-wing ideology, and most anarchists are socialists. Communism is an ideology that uses a socialist economic model, while having a classless, stateless society. I use the term anarcho-communist instead of jsut anarchist or communist is because later on the former label got taken over by anarcho-capitalists and the latter by Stalinists and Maoists.

I became anarcho-communist mainly because:

1. I never liked the policies of the Soviet Union and China, and as I result I actually used to be very anti-communist, however I came to realize that I was actually anti-authoritarian, hence the anarchist part.

2. I also mainly became anti-capitalist as a result of American foreign policy: I came to the conclusion that as capitalism is an inherently competitive economic system, and relies on perpetual expansion of power and presence to survive, so I relized that the only way that it would stop is by a complete overthrow of the current system and its replacement with a cooperative one that is not based on competition.

I am, fundamentally speaking, a Socialist. I used to call myself a Democratic Socialist, and I still want to believe that can work, but in all blunt honesty, if last year taught us anything, in the US, UK and elsewhere, it's that Democracy, as it has been enacted in the modern world, kinda doesn't work. The problem with "Democracy", using the US system as a prime example, is that two-fold.

Firstly, you have the problem of a very small number of major poltical parties that amass power and get entrenched, and then what you get is what we have: Every 4 to 8 years, you get these big political powers playing their little chess game, with the right swooping in and claiming they're going to "save the country from the left", and then the left swoops in and claims they're going to "save the country from the right", ad nauseum. Very little ever actually gets done, and little to nothing of significance ever TRULY changes, because the big political parties in power don't WANT things to change. They don't WANT things to change, because they profit far too much from the way things are, thus their only true interest is in maintaining the status quo.

Secondly, and perhaps far more importantly, people, as in the mass population, "The People", are a manic mess, and don't honestly seem to know what the hell they actually want, let alone what's actually good for them, for others, and for the planet. Most of the people that actually bothered voting in 2016 in the US, were either blind "liberals" who willingly ignored just what a scummy, fake, lying and corrupt piece of trash Hillary Clinton really is, in many ways THE blatantly single most "corporate" presidential candidate the Democratic party has ever put forth, yet they ignored this and voted for her enthusiastically. Either because they were playing SJW/Feminist "identity politics", caring more about what's between a candidates legs than what kind of person they actually are, or because they blindly want to believe that EVERY candidate the Democratic party ever puts forth, is shining gold, a true liberal beacon of hope and progress. Then you had the OTHER side, a bunch of (mostly) angry white folks, mostly male, so-called "conservative", who bought Trump's BS, not because they actually like the guy, but because they ate up all of the ridiculous, inflammatory, and often-times outright bigoted shit he was constantly saying on the campaign trail.

Neither are universal, of course. But regardless, even those who weren't fervent believers in those two candidates, there were still millions more voters who simply voted D or R, because that's how they were raised, what they've been taught, and the details be damned. It's a statistical fact that this past presidential election saw a historically low voter turnout, the lowest in decades, because, quite frankly, you had a race between the TWO phoniest, LEAST likeable candidates in a very long time, if not ever. And that's is truly saying something, because 2004 had George W Bush vs. John Kerry. This was worse than that.

I will say, for myself, that I did have a bit of hope in Bernie. Not the religious, naive, pie in the sky type of hope that many of his supporters did. I didn't even have that for Obama the first time. I liked that Bernie was an IND, and even though I understood it, I hated that he "had" to run as a DEM to even get in the national conversation, to even get noticed. And I will say, it's worth noting that it wasn't just "far left" people and college kids voting for him (though he did have the highest youth vote turnout in decades, last I checked). I personally know traditionally "conservative" voters who were going to vote for him if he made the Presidential nomination, even though he's a proud Socialist, because he's also no-nonsense, supports veterans, etc., and to many non-traditional Democrat voters, he was something of a breath of fresh air.

I held no personal illusions about him fixing everything and changing the country. But I DID think that he was a last gasp hope, of at least nudging us in the direction we SHOULD be going in, living in the 21st Century, instead of being stuck in the same old BS 1980s era politics. But I also understood, and had a bad feeling, that the deck was too far stacked against him, that Hillary had the DNC directly in her pocket, which she did. He came MIGHTY close, in spite of some very blatant and very fishy voter incidents across the country. But ultimately, he was never going to win the DEM nomination.

That wasn't the part that really bothered me. It was that when Hillary DID "win", he just immediately conceded. Myself, and many of his other supporters, had really hoped that he would switch back to IND and continue to run as the third candidate in the race (much the same as Trump had threatened to do). But instead, he just called it quits, after all of his talk, and after the historic amount of grass-roots money his supporters raised for his campaign. There is zero chance that those same supporters WOULDN'T have continued to help him as an IND. But instead, he just gave up, and worse, told his supporters to vote for Hillary.

That was the moment it all kind of finally became "real" for me. That killed me. I wasn't SUPER invested in Bernie, mind you. But it was basically the final straw the broke the camel's back for me. I have become completely tired and disillusioned with the American political game. I was already sick of it, but now I'm just done. The way I saw it, I was faced with the WORST choice of candidates in my voting lifetime, and even though, technically speaking, a Hillary win would have been "less bad" than the daily circus of a Trump presidency, I find myself very tired of voting for the "lesser of two evils", I get tired of voting for "less bad".




So yeah. I honestly did not vote in the main Presidential election. There was no point. I refused to put my stamp or approval on either candidate, and voting for Johnson or Stein would have gotten me the exact same end result that not voting at all did: either a Clinton or Trump presidency. I'll admit, I actually did not expect Trump to win. I don't think even he did. I think that Trump never truly wanted to be President, and I think if you look at his activities and attitude since he's taken office, that kind of bears out. I believe he ran as an ego stroke, a PR trip, for fun, to get the whole nation, the whole world talking about him. Because if there's one thing Trump loves, it's being the center of attention. I don't think he ever seriously wanted to be President. I think he was just as surprised as Clinton when he won. I think that, by all accounts, EVERYONE expected Clinton to win, herself most of all. She was, after all, the "anointed one", setting her sights on being the first female US President since all the way back when Bill first won the White House in the 90s.

Obviously, shit didn't go as it was probably planned to go, and now you have what you see going on. Trump, and more accurately the people Trump assembled to do the actual work because he himself doesn't actually want to be President, kind of just running with it. And the funniest part is, they're like some outcast group of DC and Big Business lifers, who the "actual" Republicans in Congress don't like or want to work with.


But regardless of all that banter....yeah. I'm a Socialist at heart. What that means to me, is what I think Socialism IS at it's core, anyway (which most people don't seem to understand), that being the principle value of: "The Good of the People should always come before the Good of the State". I do not necissarily believe in a so-called "Welfare State", as conservatives like to paint it, but I DO believe in safety nets, and I DO think that things like the quality health-care, a roof over your head, food in your stomach, clean water to drink, and the opportunity to get an education, should be fundamental rights. Hell, I'd go one more and say I think that, in the 21st Century, things like electricity and internet access should be something people don't have to pay for, as well. They've become integral enough parts of enough people's day to day lives.

But it isn't just about free health-care and free school and free stuff. Not at all. I think that a TRUE and GOOD Socialist society, would have many programs and institutions in place, that actually WORK, to prop people up, to get them on their feet, get them out the door, and HELP them to find their place in society, which is part of why access to education is so important. A lot of societies ills stem from a lack of education. And in general, more educated people tend to be more active, more inspired, and more productive people. Not to mention that, with the exception of corruption and "white collar" crime, more educated people tend to commit less crimes. That isn't universal, but the statistics bear out.


I think the right balance needs to be struck between Capitalism and Socialism. I think that all of the fundamental bases need to be covered by the State. That is the Socialist part. But I also think that people should be encouraged and enabled to START their own businesses, to offer new goods or services, to enhance the society and world around them. I think that there is a big future, both literally and figuratively, in investing heavily in infrastructure and the "Green Sector", by banking big on cleaner "Green" technologies, and putting a lot of people to work, not just on fixing highways and bridges, but on cleaning up existing pollution, getting the world caught up with the 21st Century, tackling Climate Change and Pollution head-on, etc. I think heavy investing in that alone, along with higher education, would be a great boon.


I just don't know where Democracy fits in, anymore. I can't say that I personally really believe in it. I WANT to. But I'm just so sick of the game. And I think the low voter turnout this last election shows that I'm hardly alone. I do think it's important for the People to have a voice. The people of a nation SHOULD have not just A say, but the BIGGEST say in how things are handled and what gets done. But like I said...you also have the problem of how we seem to HANDLE that. And how little the masses at large seem to truly KNOW what should be done, or what they want or need.


I guess I'll just end this by quoting a Megadeth song...

"If there's a new way, I'll be the first in line. But it better work this time."

I can't speak to what other countries do, but in America they do a terrible job, if they do any at all, of regulating prices in anything they control.  Health Care costs were a small percentage of what it was before medicare came around, at which time everything skyrocketed.  Our gov't getting involved in anything raises costs.

My political views are fuck political views.

Just because you think something doesn't mean you're part of a group A or group B or group C. If someone feels a certain way about something that doesn't mean they either HAVE to be left, right, center, etc. It's just THEIR opinion, nothing more, nothing less.

I am like mercutio in Romeo and Juliet


A pox on both your houses...