Yes, I'm saying that democracy doesn't happen. A few hundred people decide the laws. Direct democracy is the only true democracy.

So you're more concerned about what the lawmakers were than the merits of the Constitution. Just because the Consitution was written by rich people doesn't mean it the laws were made for rich people. This is ad hominem and guilt by association. Overall, your reasoning is still not related to law and you've been given ample opportunity to make your case, but not once have you gone into the merits of the laws that you have problems with.

If people prefer representative democracy over direct democracy, isn't democracy happening in that case? But people vote for the lawmakers based on their own preference on different matters, isn't this democracy?

You could say direct democracy being the true form of democracy, but in that case, we'd need considerably smaller autonomic units that we have today. Otherwise bureucracy would kill the decision making.

Very good point about Sasha Baron Cohen.

But the world is just too dumb these days. Especially these college kids. I'm constantly seeing headlines of them doing some new stupid protest, awareness, actions/ect.

Heck just today I read an article about a college wanting white people to all wear a small white badge around. They want it to bring on discussion of white priviledge. Ha, why don't we ask the jews how being told to wear a badge is a good idea or not.

But I just don't get Liberals. They scream about discrimination and wanting equality, yet they are busy labeling everybody into groups as hard as they can. Heck, look at recent election. After every debate, or any poll that came out, the talk woudl constantly be on what demographic voted for who. Talking about who women voted for, and then bashing how could a woman vote for someone. Constantly hearing about Uneducated white voters. Yea, that's great. Lets just go and call a huge group of people stupid for their label.

Well, when education system and media repeatedly did into people's minds the greatness of representative democracy without giving any other alternatives, people will think that. Also, I favor less centralized organization, as it eliminates bureaucracy.

Well, this is definitely a political issue.  But, he did.  It was something along the lines of "It was a joke, even if in retrospect it wasn't funny, I'm not actually antisemitic, etc."  Basically the standard response for this sort of thing.  

My reasoning is not entirely related to law because it's the entire system itself that is the problem: if laws were abolished the problems would still remain. It's the capitalist easy of organization itself that is the problem. Laws are just one way in which they maintain power.

So you are unable to support your allegation that the Constitution is made for rich people and instead respond with vagueness. I think we have hit a wall with our conversation, so I'm willing to just stop it here.