VGPolyglot said:
Your sarcasm doesn't amuse me. |
What are you on about. Wasn't being sarcastic and wasn't trying to amuse you. LOL
VGPolyglot said:
Your sarcasm doesn't amuse me. |
What are you on about. Wasn't being sarcastic and wasn't trying to amuse you. LOL
Kerotan said:
What are you on about. Wasn't being sarcastic and wasn't trying to amuse you. LOL |
I really don't want to lose Talon to this, things were finally looking up for the site.
VGPolyglot said:
I really don't want to lose Talon to this, things were finally looking up for the site. |
What are you even on about.
RolStoppable said:
It's not just that rules are exploited to get away with something, some people gladly use the rules to protect themselves from deserved criticism on top of that. |
That's so cute coming from you.
RolStoppable said:
Name at least one instance where this held true. |
You tried to use/skirt the rules to go after me before but you took it so far that it couldn't be overlooked. You've done that before with different people in disagreements.
RolStoppable said:
You highlighted the part about protection, but what you are talking about now doesn't qualify as using rules to protect oneself. |
You insult others in way that the rules protect you most of the time from the consequences of it.
Ka-pi96 said:
So yeah, it happened again. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/profile/126458/snoopy/ There is this, http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8618163 So maybe the ban is legit, really should have a reason and an expiry date though, right? Edit: That also seems like a pretty harsh ban. Like... what was he even banned for? |
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8545682
Ka-pi96 said:
So yeah, it happened again. http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/profile/126458/snoopy/ There is this, http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8618163 So maybe the ban is legit, really should have a reason and an expiry date though, right? Edit: That also seems like a pretty harsh ban. Like... what was he even banned for? |
Snoopy was warned for spreading false information before and in that post he pretty much copy/pasted the same exact post that got him in trouble last time. He also has an extensive (and I mean EXTENSIVE) history for trolling, which explains the length as a strong message to stop repeating the behavior. Not sure why the ban glitched, I submitted the ban with a long note explaining it.
Bandorr said:
The ban looks glitched still. I don't see a length or a reason. I get the reason, what is the length? |
30 Days, with a final warning.