By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Microsoft Discussion - Why I am not worried about getting FFXV on the Xbox

Goodnightmoon on 01 December 2016
OnyxPhoenix said:
Mafioso said:

I wouldn't be worried either .

Just enjoy it on Xbox One, it runs smoother. The visual differences are not that significant, even on Pro.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcJx2EBJuUk

This game really needs a proper PC port to shine its brightest. Squeenix has to have 4K/8K texture masters it could use.

watch a digitalfoundry video, the image is blurry as fuck on the xbox, and performance is the same, ps4 just has frame pacing issues, that's something entirely different from performance issues, the game runs at a rock solid 30fps on both, Bloodborne had frame pacing issues and it still plays better than 99% of the action games out there

Frame pacing issues is a way worse problem that a more blurry image, one affectes the feeling of the entire gameplay, the other is something your eyes can easily adapt, and we are talking about 900p not 480p.



Around the Network
Mafioso on 01 December 2016
OnyxPhoenix said:
Mafioso said:

I wouldn't be worried either .

Just enjoy it on Xbox One, it runs smoother. The visual differences are not that significant, even on Pro.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AcJx2EBJuUk

This game really needs a proper PC port to shine its brightest. Squeenix has to have 4K/8K texture masters it could use.

watch a digitalfoundry video, the image is blurry as fuck on the xbox, and performance is the same, ps4 just has frame pacing issues, that's something entirely different from performance issues, the game runs at a rock solid 30fps on both, Bloodborne had frame pacing issues and it still plays better than 99% of the action games out there

 

That video i linked shows me what i need to see just fine.

Digital Foundry is still using a fat XBO, their comparos don't tell me how the framerate is better with XBO S, or show me a 4K upscale compared to Pro.

Don't try to tell me that microstutter is acceptable. I'm a PC gamer, that is the biggest pet peve in all of gaming. Its terrible and creeps up to tell you are playing a flawed game. You couldn't pay me to play a game like that. Its an action game with camera, it would drive me nuts. It has to play smooth for me.



PC I i7 3770K @4.5Ghz I 16GB 2400Mhz I GTX 980Ti FTW

Consoles I PS4 Pro I Xbox One S 2TB I Wii U I Xbox 360 S

AsGryffynn on 03 December 2016
Radek said:
Azzanation said:

Think you completely forgot that money talks. 

Its not hard to get a game running in 4k. Some PC indie games have 4k options.

While it may be true for PC games which are designed with all the resolutions and graphical options in mind on day one... it's not that way on consoles.

Otherwise explain why huge and great selling games like The Witcher 3 and GTA V didn't get PS4 Pro updates? GTA V sold 12 millions on PS4, Witcher 3 sold almost 4 million in retail for PS4. What about Batman Arkham Knight? And other big games.

All they would have to do is port better quality presets from PC version or just "lazy" 3200x1800 and Witcher 3 would already look much better on PS4.

Third party developers don't care for the most part, there are few 2015 games updated for PS4 Pro and 1 - 2014 Game (Shadow Of Mordor)

And that's PS4 we are talking about, the best selling console that always sells 2:1 or even 3:1 in third party games compared to Xbox. (See Witcher 3 for 3:1)

I don't think FFXV on Xbox One will sell 1 million copies, therefore don't count on Scorpio treatment.

Expect new games like RDR 2 to be ehnanced for Scorpio though. 

I think you literally have written exactly how many copies it will sell through. Around 1.5 Million. 

 

 

This isn't Persona. Final Fantasy XV works on WRPG rules and from the looks of it, the game itself suffers from Falloutitis...