I am not counting Minecraft
I don't even like Wii Sports but there's no fucking question it was the primary driver of Wii sales.
Wii Sports Sales were limited by Wii production. The console was sold out worldwide for the first two years. But especially at launch, there was no chance of the game outselling GTA because there were not that many Wii console made.
01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01001001 01111001 01101111 01101100 01100001 01101000 00100001 00100000 01000110 01101111 01110010 00100000 01000101 01110100 01100101 01110010 01101110 01101001 01110100 01111001 00100001 00100000
Please, no more of "this game does/not count because its bundled" or "it's on everything". Every one of this games are great, and sold equally great. No need to argue about which one has more merit.
Darwinianevolution said: Please, no more of "this game does/not count because its bundled" or "it's on everything". Every one of this games are great, and sold equally great. No need to argue about which one has more merit. |
Well done on using common sense.
And as pointed out in the OP, these are technically speaking the three best selling console games of all time (that are also available on other platforms). It's not even a comparison as such. It's just a chart to show how those 3 games sold, each having unique cirumstances that have led to them being the top 3.
(Excluding things like Tetris of course which have been around for years and re-released millions of times)
Ka-pi96 said:
It's not unfair, it's factually incorrect. Wii Sports may be owned by that many people, but it didn't SELL that many copies... |
Tell Nintendo that.
NateH said: On one hand, Wii Sports was bundled with the Wii, but is also an exclusive. |
That's a good point. What Wii Sports did is much more impressive not only because it was exclusive but because of the type of game it was. People forget that it was considered a joke before it launched and expected to bomb. It changed the industry.
Dr.Vita said:
|
All I'm reading here is the reason a retail game - Wii Sports - was massively succesful, but nothing here indicates why it can't be compared with other games. Wii Sports is a game, a game not unlike the massively bundled Lego Indiana Jones or Kung Fu Panda on 360 (games that some people very well touched once and then forgot on their library). Its something you can have in your library, a disc you can lend to your friends, or resell at the store:
(fifth to the left)
It's in essence a game, not unlike any other, with the added benefit on being bundled with the Wii's. It's a game whose success can be compared with other games.
You talk about having the option to buy a PS4 without GTA V. Using the same logic, you could buy certain Wiis without Wii Sports, such as the Mario Kart pack (without Wii Sports, as there were some that included it), the Wii Fit one, or when they ditched Wii Sports and started bundling Wii Sports Resort (which is the sequel, hence a different game). That argument of yours only makes the case on Wii and Wii Sports even more valid, as you've really not pointed out why can't we use Wii Sports as a metric. Wikipedia (for all that it's worth, of course) has listed Wii Sports as the third best-selling videogame ever in history, with GTA V (breathtakingly enough) being the fourth, below 20 millions to surpass it. No mention of Minesweeper or Solitaire, so their metric does exclude them but includes Wii Sports.