But can it run minecraft? Byt damn 11 Teraflops, that is the combined graphical power of 6 PS4's. Perhaps 4k 120fps is becoming a reality.

If you count all the new pixels that this card can render, based on transistor count and teraflops, I imagine even the most hardcore minecraft enthusiast will be satisfied

Dear god, what a beast! Too bad you have to choose between getting this or a car... This will be the first single GPU for proper 4k gaming, it seems, should manage to clock in at 55-60 fps stable.

Still not the maximum thats possible on 16nm 25% more clock and chip can get bigger too bet we will see 20 Tflops on 16nm in the next years.

In the professional version of this card, where it belongs.

So you're saying it won't be the first single GPU to manage 4K?

Nvidia-flops seem to be better than AMD-flops, though. See the 4.6 TF GTX 1060 beating the RX 480 for instance.

Besides, this one probably has FP64 and can do bitmining and other scientific computing tasks. Being a bigger chip, yields should be way lower, so it is more expensive to produce than merely scaling from size and performance alone suggests.

For gaming, though, it would be wise to wait the inevitable 3200/3072 SP GTX 1080 Ti which will be hundreds of dollars cheaper and overclock better. Titan cards are a very acquired taste...

Which card can play 4k on ultra settings today? A GTX 1080 OC will creep up to the 50-55 mark in a few titles but most be in the 40's range, with dips way below. I think there's only benchmarks for one title where it managed more than 60 fps average and that was Dirt Rally.
On Ultra settings @ 4k, there aren't really any decent options right now unless you go SLi or Crossfire, if one is going to spend several thousand dollars on a gaming rig, at least you'll want high tier performance at 4k.

For my part, I'm fine with 1440p, a big step of from 1080p and a lot less demanding on the system.

There are so many odd things with this Titan card, starting with Nvidia using the same name as the last Titan again.

Then there's the specs:

Not only is Nvidia using the same GDDR5X of the 1080 instead of HBM 2.0, but it doesn't even have 50% more cores and the frequencies are much lower.

I'm not a fan of SLI/X-fire, but you'll get more performance buying two 1080 and SLI them, and for about the same money.

I m actually not impressed and more so confused about it releasing so soon. Generally it takes a while for the Titan series to get launched but this time, its here shortly after the 1080. It may hint at a shorter generation for Pascal... So if that is the case and their next gen comes out next year with hardware Async and HBM2, I see no reason for me to even look at Pascal.

We will see tho.

Yeah, looking at it like this makes it look like pretty poor value, even for a premium card.