You gotta be fucking kidding me.

I don't buy that she didn't get threats. Look we're all gamers, we all know there are some real fucking morons in our ranks sometimes.

It's unfortunate but true.

Look at that Jimmy Kimmel skit were he made fun of that video game Youtube service, and that lead to death threats just for a silly little comedy sketch.

Some people cannot take any joking, critcism, or anything of the game industry, in a way they're not that far removed from religious zealots like the Taliban. 

Well, they are highly qualified and more than experienced enough to give such a presentation. Good to hear!

I remember in a tweet of hers, she accused Keemstar, MrRepzion, thunderf00t, and AlphaOmegaSin for slander and harassement despite that they... didn't slander nor harassed her...

The problem is that people like Anita actually do not want to have a head-to-head debate. They want to be coddled by the media so that they can continuing pushing their narrative.

You just about described some 90% of all US sitcoms ever made.

Anita thinks that (through the influence of video games) male gamers are highly privileged and can get whatever they want without repercussions or consequences.

Talk about projection...

So many "gamers" afraid of Anita her influence reaching UN. Poor gamergaters. Hahaha.

So? If people don't realise online bullying/harassment and other problems stemming from the idea of hiding behind a username exists, then they are stupid in themselves. It's not just related to games, it's all forms.

I have never known a community so protective over how they act disrespectfully online.

Afraid? I think you're confused as to who is afraid here. Let's not forget that, while Anita says that people should be critical of media's influence, apparently her own content is exempt from this suggestion (For that matter, a great deal of what she says/does is a actually hypocritical of her Patriarchy claims). She goes to great lengths to silence any critics that present her with facts, facts which undermine her flawed ideology.

Anita is the one afriad of people critisizing her ideology. That's why she only approves of one-sided hive-mind "discussions" regarding her idea of feminism. She doesn't want to have actual discussions with people opposing her view, since she knows she can't win those discussions. She wants to push her agenda, and silence any competition... Much like Putin in a way. The worst part is that she is able to get away with this!

Whenever someone says something that disagrees with Antia's idea of feminism, most people would call it "critisism" while she calls it "harrasment". In other words, she plays a professional victim, a "get out of jail free" card, rather than actually provide any counter arguments with any real facts whatsoever (Presumably because she has a severe shortage of these so-called "facts")

If Anita really was correct in her views, she would be open to critisism, since she would be able to counter those critisisms with facts. But she can't. Any time someone tries to prevent other people critisizing their work or ideas, that's often a very obvious red flag.

The simple rule to determine how serious and legitimate harassment is:

1) how much has that person made headlines based of the harassment?
2) how much has that person made headlines based on ANYTHING else?

If 2>>1, take the claims seriously. If 1>>2, they're very likely professional victims who're actively provoking it. No-one cares about harassing a nobody. I guess Sarkeesian is kinda a famous name at this point, even if it is mostly based on the media promoting her as a victim, but Zoe Quinn is a complete nobody. She's done nothing of value or interest. Why on earth would anyone be still harassing her?