I'll be getting that Aqua Vita.

Other than that, I may invest some Christmas money into some more retros.

This.  Also let see what happen if the new zelda end up cross gen, you will see how that game will be considered exclusive using as an excuse minor differences.  I am calling it now.

Final Fantasy 7's reboot is a timed exclusive to the PS4. Xbox One will get it, eventually.

Both companies have diverse libraries. The first Xbox was the shooter box, but the 360 and One are proving different. The PS consoles "Diversity" comes from the fact that they are more Japanese centric (which is definitely a plus). I just cannot stand when people dont admit that both will have japanese games. Sony will just have more.

There isnt 100% confirmation so what I said still stand. 

It depends on the FF15 and KH3 sales. FF Type 0 bombed hard on Xbox One, DQXI will not be on Xbox One, the PS4 will have an even stronger stronger lead when the game will release, and insiders suggest a SFV type of deal. FF7 is also a Playstation game. 

Nothing right now is pushing SE to make the Xbox One port. They maybe will, of course, but they really don't need to. It's very different from the TR situation. 

It literally said "Play it first on Playstation 4" on the remake video. Come on, bro..its common sense by now. Its a timed exclusive.

Type 0 wasnt on any popular radar. Thats most likely why they made an HD version of the game and bundled it with the demo that they expected to 
sell. Crafty little buggers. I think people learned their lesson from Halo and crackdown on the Xbox about buying a game strictly for the demo. The actual game will sell much better. Anyway, the FF trailer said "Play it first on Playstation" which has always alluded to timed exclusivity. This is no test. Isn't Microsoft in Squares back pocket right now with Tomb Raider? In the west Microsoft has the better deals with Japan and in the east Square and Sony are closer. Its just the ways of money and profit.

true but you also have to understand that xb1 isn't xb360 where it had a good marketshare almost everywhere thus investing in japanese games on xb360 made more sense back then that it's now.  "play it first on ps4" can mean a lot of things that it shouldn't be use as a 100% confirmation (DQX1 ring a bell?, the game is coming to ps4 with NX in mind).  Thing is ps4 is killing xb1 everywhere except US, so if FF15 and KH3 flopped hard on xb1 because that american audiencie didn't pick it up, you can expect ff7 remake exclusive for the single reason of making sense than anything else.  japanese games on xb1 are still unproven as the only games that we have is FF type 0 and even though it's not a mainline game, it might give an indication that japanese fans aren't on the console, hence why some might think FF15 and KH3 might be the real indicator.

Type 0 wasn't on any popular radar but sold something like 80% on the PS4. Microsoft in Square's back pocket? Sure, that's why SE announced that they might port DQXI on the future unreleased NX before even mentioning the Xbox One... And strangely, FF7 is closer to DQ than TR in term of audience. Don't you think that the "first on Playstation" could mean PS4 and NX? Or, even easier, PS4 and PC right now, and we'll see about the others later without killing the possibility? And if in 2017-2018 it's useless to release the game on another platform (and it will be IMO), it's fine because nobody mentioned it. 

I don't understand what you're talking about when you say that MS has better deals with SE. Hitman has PS exclusive content, FF14 is PS/PC, Dragon Quest is PS/Nintendo, Star Ocean PS, Nier 2 PS4, Saga PS too no? The "better deals" you're talking about is just Tomb Raider money hatted timed exclusivity, and that thing really backfired (oh, Just Cause marketing too?). SE has no reason to give MS deals... But, on the other hand, they said that they want to work with Playstation to help the home consoles market in Japan... 

I'm still not saying that FF7R won't be on Xbox One, but it's a possibility because it will surely be useless to do this port and nothing (except another big check from MS) is pushing SE to do it, unlike the TR situation.