Usual suspects downplaying anything Sony related. This is getting tiring.
User has been moderated for this post.
- Shinobi-san
Usual suspects downplaying anything Sony related. This is getting tiring.
User has been moderated for this post.
- Shinobi-san
kowenicki said:
Its certainly close to or over $100m. Been reported many times if you could be bothered looking. The movie is a financial and reputational disaster. |
Again, source? Even if that was true, that is FAR from "hundreds of millions of dollars". Hyperbole, don't do it.
The One and Only
At this rate, it'll fail to make its costs back.
kowenicki said:
|
I said tiring, not offending, so no need to be sorry. Glad you recognize yourself in those usual suspects though.
kowenicki said:
Of course. I'm not an idiot. But perhaps you could explain how 15m take on a film costing 4 times this with a further 100m in other losses expected is good?
|
Perharps I don't care. I was merely commenting the fact that some guys (you're not the only one) have to try and make any Sony-related news/facts looking bad/worse than they are.
@Bail you've already been warned. If you going to continue the discussion do so by abiding by the rules. Stay on topic and steer clear of comments that are targeted at people.
Similarly Kowen its probably best you step away as well.
That debate is really not going anywhere constructive. Please drop it.
kowenicki said:
I was on topic and discussing the matter at hand and he comes in PURELY (by his own admission in his last post) to derail and have a pop at me and others. So no, I wont step away from this discussion. I will ignore any more ports from him here though. |
I meant from the discussion with Bail specifically not the thread. If you feel he is breaking the rules then just report and move on.
Shinobi-san said: @Bail you've already been warned. If you going to continue the discussion do so by abiding by the rules. Stay on topic and steer clear of comments that are targeted at people. |
I get it. My bad.