By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Website Topics - The Mod Team: Questions, Comments, Concerns? Ask Here!

RolStoppable said:
kinisking said:

It definitely won't feel the same without jay, and some might leave out of principle. Jay's ban will and has had a big impact on the empire.

I have my doubts that anyone will leave, considering that Jay's site is far from ready (so there's no other place to go to yet) and that all of the alphas are very likely to stay.

There will be a transition period where people get to grips with sharing the work that Jay has done before, but things should run smoothly again very soon. But it won't feel the same without Jay, yes.

That was exactly my arguement against everyone leaving earlier today! Great minds think alike :)



Ltd predictions by the time 9th Gen comes out

Ps4:110million

Xbox one :75 million( was 65) 

Wii u: 20 milliion

Around the Network

Well, this all made for an interesting read.

I strategically went to bed before all this went down.



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

RolStoppable said:
starcraft said:
Well, this all made for an interesting read.

I strategically went to bed before all this went down.

Did this really make a difference? You usually sleep on the job.

Fair point.



starcraft - Playing Games = FUN, Talking about Games = SERIOUS

I come back to the Chartz and this is what I see? This whole site fell apart in my weeklong absence.

First of all, when did you guys start banning people based on PMs? I remember when a PM from John Lucas was leaked on the site with him insulting a bunch of people. Yet he didn't get banned for that. Second of all, you shouldn't be banning someone just because they're talking about starting a new site through private messaging. How silly. Who cares if he starts a new site? Are you gonna ban everyone who talks about Vizioneck?

And who's the person who went and told the mods about Jay's PMs? That's a pretty underhanded thing to do if you ask moi.



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!

Fusioncode said:
I come back to the Chartz and this is what I see? This whole site fell apart in my weeklong absence.

First of all, when did you guys start banning people based on PMs? I remember when a PM from John Lucas was leaked on the site with him insulting a bunch of people. Yet he didn't get banned for that. Second of all, you shouldn't be banning someone just because they're talking about starting a new site through private messaging. How silly. Who cares if he starts a new site? Are you gonna ban everyone who talks about Vizioneck?

And who's the person who went and told the mods about Jay's PMs? That's a pretty underhanded thing to do if you ask moi.


I believe that you're misunderstanding this. Might want to reread everything related to the ban. 



Around the Network
Aeolus451 said:
Fusioncode said:
I come back to the Chartz and this is what I see? This whole site fell apart in my weeklong absence.

First of all, when did you guys start banning people based on PMs? I remember when a PM from John Lucas was leaked on the site with him insulting a bunch of people. Yet he didn't get banned for that. Second of all, you shouldn't be banning someone just because they're talking about starting a new site through private messaging. How silly. Who cares if he starts a new site? Are you gonna ban everyone who talks about Vizioneck?

And who's the person who went and told the mods about Jay's PMs? That's a pretty underhanded thing to do if you ask moi.


I believe that you're misunderstanding this. Might want to reread everything related to the ban. 

He got banned because he talked about creating a new site through PMs. Explain what I've misunderstood about this whole thing. 

I'll wait. 



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!

Fusioncode said:
Aeolus451 said:


I believe that you're misunderstanding this. Might want to reread everything related to the ban. 

He got banned because he talked about creating a new site through PMs. Explain what I've misunderstood about this whole thing. 

I'll wait. 


Not only through PMs. Read again.



Hynad said:
Fusioncode said:

He got banned because he talked about creating a new site through PMs. Explain what I've misunderstood about this whole thing. 

I'll wait. 


Not only through PMs. Read again.

Maybe you should try reading again?

He got a warning for talking about his site publically on the forum. Then he got permabanned for doing it through PMs. 



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!

Fusioncode said:
Hynad said:


Not only through PMs. Read again.

Maybe you should try reading again?

He got a warning for talking about his site publically on the forum. Then he got permabanned for doing it through PMs. 


Yes. And you don't see a reason why that's wrong?

He was doing his PR job on the forums, using VGC as a platform for his own publicity and personal gain, and he was asked to stop (by ioi himself, no less). But he still kept doing it behind the scene via PMs. The point is, he was asked to stop, but he did not.



Hynad said:
Fusioncode said:

Maybe you should try reading again?

He got a warning for talking about his site publically on the forum. Then he got permabanned for doing it through PMs. 


Yes. And you don't see a reason why that's wrong?

He was doing his PR job on the forums, using VGC as a platform for his own publicity, and he was asked to stop (by ioi himself, no less). But he still kept doing it behind the scene via PMs. The point is, he was asked to stop, but he did not.

I've never seen someone get banned for private messages. Especially not a permaban. Either way, I don't see the big deal with keeping it to PMs. Publically? Yeah I can understand why that's an issue but sending someone a PM is like sending them a text message. Who cares?



Sigs are dumb. And so are you!