By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - Politics Discussion - Scotland: NO to Independence. 55.3% NO, 44.7% YES. Salmond resigns, woo hoo!

I'd expected the Yes voters to edge out the No ones. Still a very narrow margin.
Not surprisingly, Glasgow voted for independence.



Around the Network

This was no fair vote. SECRET governmebts everywhere.



Its important to remember 45% didn't want independence. A good chunk of them wanted to stick it to the Tories and to hell with the consequences.

Hopefully it might finally make the main parties realise there is discourse with the current status quo throughout the UK though. But somehow I doubt it. Until a week before a referendum suddenly 51% of the UK became in favour of abolishing parliament...



RIP Dad 25/11/51 - 13/12/13. You will be missed but never forgotten.

they made the right choice, independence is something that could happen for Scotland, but not necessarily, especially at this time



don't mind my username, that was more than 10 years ago, I'm a different person now, amazing how people change ^_^

I am proud of the United Kingdom!



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F1gWECYYOSo

Please Watch/Share this video so it gets shown in Hollywood.

Around the Network

Man, I always try to align myself with Scotland in Europa Universalis, because I hate it when England grows too big and powerful - I always try to hinder the creation of Great Britain as much as possible. I usually also try to help Burgundy against France whenever possible.



I'm on Twitter @DanneSandin!

Furthermore, I think VGChartz should add a "Like"-button.

kowenicki said:
Banz said:
I'd expected the Yes voters to edge out the No ones. Still a very narrow margin.
Not surprisingly, Glasgow voted for independence.


In political and electoral terms this isnt "very narrow". 

Votes of 2m v 1.5m isnt "very narrow".


Still 45% is a very significant number of people. That's a large number of Scots who don't want to be a part of Britain.

This wasn't a vote for electing a new government, it was a vote for secession. 45% is huge when you think of that.



kowenicki said:
Banz said:
kowenicki said:
Banz said:
I'd expected the Yes voters to edge out the No ones. Still a very narrow margin.
Not surprisingly, Glasgow voted for independence.


In political and electoral terms this isnt "very narrow". 

Votes of 2m v 1.5m isnt "very narrow".


Still 45% is a very significant number of people. That's a large number of Scots who don't want to be a part of Britain.

This wasn't a vote for electing a new government, it was a vote for secession. 45% is huge when you think of that.


...and 55% voted to stay.  That is huge.

So they lost the vote. Doesn't change the fact that almost half of them don't want to stay in your country. In these cases you'd expect one of the sides to be victorious by a huge margin.In the Junagad referendum in 1948, 99% of the voters to join India. That is what you call huge.

45-55 is till too close. As the demographics of Scotland change with time, the result may change.

 

 



Whatever the result, it would cause a rift in the country. Salmond should go anyway mainly because i don't like him, SNP can stay in power as they deserve it but not with him at the help.

Now we need the Scots vote to help us rid Cameron from his PM spot.



Hmm, pie.

kowenicki said:
Just had to listen to Brian Cox (who lives in New York for most of the year but keeps a home in a nice part of Edinburgh) spout on about how it should have been a YES vote. Easy for him to say, he can vote yes then fly back to Manhattan leaving the chaos behind. Is there anything worse than when the media asks celebrities about politics? Really grinds my gears.

Andy Murray has lost fans, no doubt.



Hmm, pie.