Well, everyone prepare for this shit to become normalized and the free games Microsoft and Sony were giving us to be gimped now. Because they damn sure won't include EA or Ubi titles after these services take off. Then eventually they won't include 2k, Activision, Konami, Namco, Square or Capcom either.
| hinch said:
Yeah, I won't be supporting this.. We're paying less for content and ownership of our games as it is. And just like how DLC started well, these companies will always find news ways of squeeze more out of consumers and lock away more content. Things should have been included in the first place.. With online passes, microtransactions and now this. Nope. I don't have any faith in these companies at all - in not screwing us over. If this takes off.. this will probably be the last generation gaming for me. At least on consoles. |
This. I'm not quitting console gaming, but the nickeling and diming and milking consumers dry has to stop.
| Brotherstotheend said: square enix and capcom have hardly enough games per year to make that kind of deal interesting, even activision couldn´t probably do it, since they only have crappy movie games and call of duty (and skylanders, but you can´t play that without additional hardware, so it wouldn´t make sense |
Maybe not Capcom but might still not stop them from doing it. Square Enix are Eidos, they have plenty of games. Activision makes more sense, they could put 3 or 4 year old CoDs on there, no one is buying those new by then and anyone using the game is eating up resources and just costing them moeny. Adding a service like this provides them with extra income on old games.
Hmm, pie.
| Smear-Gel said: I can't help but wonder if we are heading to another video games crash. |
So long as Nintendo stays strong, we should be okay
Click this button, you know you want to! [Subscribe]
Watch me on YouTube!
http://www.youtube.com/user/TheRadishBros
~~~~ Mario Kart 8 drove far past my expectations! Never again will I doubt the wheels of a Monster Franchise! :0 ~~~~
After how well uplay panned out I am just on the edge of my seat in anticipation.
radishhead said:
So long as Nintendo stays strong, we should be okay |
Uh...
Sigs are dumb. And so are you!
The Fury said:
Maybe not Capcom but might still not stop them from doing it. Square Enix are Eidos, they have plenty of games. Activision makes more sense, they could put 3 or 4 year old CoDs on there, no one is buying those new by then and anyone using the game is eating up resources and just costing them moeny. Adding a service like this provides them with extra income on old games. |
hardly comparable with ea multiple yearly sport franchises+battlefield+bioware games+other stuff like nfs, mirrors edge, star wars battlefront or pvz,
activision access would have to be really cheaper or it would pale in comparision
radishhead said:
So long as Nintendo stays strong, we should be okay |
So we're fucked then?
| cheshirescat said:
|
there is always steam to save us
| hinch said:
Yeah, I won't be supporting this.. We're paying less for content and ownership of our games as it is. And just like how DLC started well, these companies will always find news ways of squeeze more out of consumers and lock away more content. Things should have been included in the first place.. With online passes, microtransactions and now this. Nope. I don't have any faith in these companies at all - in not screwing us over. If this takes off.. this will probably be the last generation for gaming, for me. At least on consoles. |
THIS
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
