It showed you shouldn't draw conclusions did it not? It's relative, 1 game out of 10 means as little as 10 out of a 100. That the post of yours that initialised this was unnecessary, was the point.

And I wasn't the one that did that.

Different strokes for different folks. One mans meat is another mans poison. Etc.

I have the entire Prime trilogy ranked abouve Super Metroid. :P

I'm done with this. Talking to you is like talking to a wall. 
If these are his TOP 10, you get a idea of the ideals this person has for games. Drawing a conclusion from this makes sense because you actually have sources to draw back on. Lucky this is VG and I'll get a ban for stating how logical your comment is. Lol My point, YOU are trying to blow a simple deduction based off a top10 list out of proportion. I didn't say the games were bad. Why you're crying makes no sense. My opinion is completely valid for the circumstance. You've tried to combat my opinion with irrelevant things and a math problem. Who the hell cares how accurate or not I am? It's posted, I give my opinion and that's it. The info would comprise of 100 games if they wanted to hear what opinions people have on that. STOP WASTING BOTH OF OUR TIME WITH NON-SENSE BASED RESPONSES. Thank you.

You shouldn't feel bad when someone's list of favorite games consists of excellent games. ;)

Lol, touche

Am I? The 360/PS3 library was pretty diverse, yet few of their major titles seemed as if they were aimed directly at me. :/ Although, the Batman games proved to be a huge exception (#15 for Asylum, #22 for City). It was a terrible gen as far as my personal gaming tastes go (tradiional action/adventure, platformers, JRPGs), provided that I completely ignore Wii and DS.

I do love the PS2 though.

Yep. Civ V is #26 on the list, so I'd be all over it.

It counts.

About time someone understood the point of this thread. :)

That's pretty much the only reason you need.