MGS2 the highest and MGS3 the lowest? Metacritic is fucking broken.

Anyway, I paid £23 for it. It's certainly steep considering it's a game that places heavy emphasis on story, and I'm not happy, but I really don't want to miss out on it as it looks incredible. I'll certainly get more for my money than I did with other games or DLCs.

I see no problem in MGS2 scoring better than MGS3 :)

When I saw the blue icon pop up in the forum buddy, I knew it would be you.

What the hell does price have to do with how good a game is? I don't care if you can't afford the dam thing or disagree with its price, I want to know about the product.

I am not worried about what the reviews are for my own sake. This will be a day one purchase for me regardless, but to slander a game based on something that has no effect on how it plays or the quality of the product is totally unprofessional. I can see a minor mention, and a blog about it, but to mislead consumers in the review is ridiculous.

Hope we don't see more places take this angle. A product is reviewed based on the product, it is the consumers decision whether the product is worth its price.

Well, that's nothing to brag about! When I saw it too I knew you would be replying to me! :(

It's incorrect, would be my main problem with it.

What's incorrect about MGS2 scoring better than MGS3?!

This lol. Game was falsely marketed. You play most of it as some lame ass Snake wannabe. Also to this day i don't know what that hell happened in the last couple of hours. 

Nightmares, still.

The fact that the game was falsely marketed, and that you play as a Snake wannabe are part of MGS2's plot. Which makes it even more brilliant.