Lol, I think we all know there are no female penises.

Just like the tailbone and the appendix, huh?

Oh, and we bring it up because that's what the thread is about. Don't blame anyone for staying on topic. I don't see what confidence has anything to do with it either. It's not a thread about size.

That doesn't change the face that it's a BS argument, the research out there is so biased (both ways) that it's impossible to make a conclusion. Like I said, getting an infection depends on how well you look after your penis, and to go and cut bits off it to 'perhaps' save an infection you wouldn't have got (seriously how many people even get an infection due to foreskin??!) is crazy.

I'm not having a go at people talking about it in this topic, obviously. Talking about the OP and in general on the net. Strikes me as insecurity, you had that right stripped away from you and you have to live with it so you make out it's a good thing (not talking about you, no idea if you have or not).

Well first of all, it's a Spurge thread. It's pretty well establised that he makes threads about any random thing that crosses his mind and we don't try to draw any logic from it. It's just there, there is no real purpose or intent behind it, and looking for one is a waste of your time, so you can have fun with it or ignore it. Also, he never actually stated whether he's circumcised. He could very well have a hood down there like you.

Well first of all, it's a Spurge thread. It's pretty well establised that he makes threads about any random thing that crosses his mind and we don't try to draw any logic from it. It's just there, there is no real purpose or intent behind it, and looking for one is a waste of your time, so you can have fun with it or ignore it. Also, he never actually stated whether he's circumcised. He could very well have a hood down there like you.

Well, there have been several cut/uncut controversy threads and general penis threads over the years. I'm pretty sure he posted his dick specs in some of those. I have a feeling he's been cut down to size.

"There is no scientific proof that circumcision reduces infections."

http://www.webmd.com/sexual-conditions/guide/circumcision

http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/circumcision/MY01023/METHOD=print

There were hundreds of other sources I could have linked, but a quick Google search can net you the same proof stating other wise.

"Also, sex is more pleasurable with the foreskin."

That's like saying Everclear is more potent that Absolut Vodka, or pure Colombian coke is stronger than some crap cooked up on the street. My penis is plenty sensitive enough. If I need to make it more sensitive, then that's what Christy's Toy Box is in business for.

There's a thread that circles back around every few weeks asking how often you get laid, and many of you are nice enough to be honest and admit you're still waiting for the first, second or third time. So how the hell would most of you know just how good it is with and without? What, did you get some, get your foreskin removed, get more booty, get the foreskin reapplied, then have the most mindblowing sex of your life?

EDIT: Also, the question was "Which is worse?". I answered the question. Notice how the only people saying a flat-chested woman are arguing in the interest of their flappy penises. They aren't saying a word about the health of the woman. I'd love for any females on this forum to weigh in on their thoughts on the health benefits/drawbacks of their breast size, along with their thoughts on uncircumcised penises vs. circumcised.

haha, oh boy. Don't let someone wrong read that :P