Incubi said:
Personally, I couldn't care less about that game, but that is what the Sony fans will bring up to "prove" PS4 is a powerhouseXD |
Sony Fans need to get a better idea of what the color blue is supposed to look like then
Dr.EisDrachenJaeger said:
Sony Fans need to get a better idea of what the color blue is supposed to look like then |
Huh?
Killzone shadow fall looks incredible.
| nin10do said: So guys, before I finish the prep work, why don't you tell me why the PS4 is more powerful than the Wii U? Nobody has even made a case for that yet. So go ahead, explain to me your reasoning. Each generation is a fresh slate, are you just making assumptions because Sony had the most powerful system on the market last generation? If you mention the original Wii your credibility is lost. |
Do you willfully ignore what has been posted a large number of times before for giggles, or because you are that much of a console partisan that you choose not to want to pay attention? One can argue the extra power doesn't matter. But to say NO ONE has argued it, means you are not paying attention. Stuff like this has been done over and over and over and over...
http://www.ign.com/wikis/xbox-one/PS4_vs._Xbox_One_vs._Wii_U_Comparison_Chart
Stuff of note:
* 4x less memory, and inferior to what the PS4 is running.
* Much less internal storage.
* Magnitude less shaders.
* Multiple less cores in the CPU.
* Half the space on the disks.
* Magnitude less shader throughput.
So, next up, you need to argue that all that doesn't matter in the real world. You can't argue no one showed you. I just did. You CAN argue it doesn't matter though. And I suggest anyone seeing this here, whenever you spout off EVER again about no one showing you, go ahead and point to this thread to get you to remember. Because, another thing is maybe you are having problems remembering things, so that would help.
John Lucas, what about an hypothetical google console running android OS with competitive specs ?
| nin10do said: The Wii U's CPU has a 4-stage pipeline. Running above 1 GHz with a 4-stage pipeline is very impressive. The Jaguar CPU has up to a 14-stage pipeline. These Jaguar CPUs are capable of a much higher clock rate than 1.5 GHz. Each core in the Wii U's CPU is at least twice as powerful as each Jaguar core due to being far more efficient with clock rates. The only difference here is that the PS4 and XB1 have 8 cores and not 6. |
Ok so I went way back in the thread to see what nin10do was saying. How have people interpreted this part?
^ 8 Jaguar cores wont ever get the benefit of simultaneous usage at maximum.
| richardhutnik said: Stuff of note: * 4x less memory, and inferior to what the PS4 is running. * Much less internal storage. * Magnitude less shaders. * Multiple less cores in the CPU. * Half the space on the disks. * Magnitude less shader throughput.
So, next up, you need to argue that all that doesn't matter in the real world. You can't argue no one showed you. I just did. You CAN argue it doesn't matter though. And I suggest anyone seeing this here, whenever you spout off EVER again about no one showing you, go ahead and point to this thread to get you to remember. Because, another thing is maybe you are having problems remembering things, so that would help. |
But aren't you forgetting the super-efficient PowerPC-CPU of the WiiU? ;)
Okay, the GPU is much more important for the overall graphic power than the CPU... and the PowerPC in the WiiU is of the third generation, not of the actual fifth generation.
And let's forget that Apple changed from PowerPC to x86 because Intel's progress in efficiency (performance per watt) was much faster than IBM's : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apple%27s_transition_to_Intel_processors#Reasons
The netburst architecture was a real power hog, so no wonder Sony, Microsoft and Nintendo decided against it when they were planning their 7th generation consoles in 2003 - 2004. But that changed with the Athlon64 (AMD) and the Core2Duo (Intel), since then the x86-CPUs got more efficient every year.
Nintendo went with PowerPC because x86 designs needs a lot of RAM to function^
| RedPikmin95 said: And here's something interesting about WiiU's sales: And another interesting quote from a poster named "Gamegears". "Actually Zelda did some of that itself.. I posted elsewhere.. that Amazon sales on The Wii U and all bundles rose by hundreds and thousands (In some cases ) and this is not only good for Nintendo.. sales on third party games.. have literally jumped up thousands of places... so yeah..you should start seeing a lot of new profiles all over the place.. Zelda, Nintendo Land, New Super Mario Bros/Luigi Bros. U and Pikmen 3 along with Wonderful 101 being the primary culprits going by Amazons top 100... the price cut will help it as well.. "
It begins... |
Thus begins a new age for Nintendo and the the twilight of the HD Warriors.
About the sales, it is worth mentioning that the Wii U still hasn't been launched on Brazil and i personally believe that its going to be a big hit around here and im telling you why:
The average price of the Xone is around R$ 2.200 wich is about US 1000, one thousand dollars thanks to all those cursed taxes and stuff, so it is very, very expensive for the average consumer here.
The Ps4 is a little bit cheaper, its price varies from R$ 1.800 to R$ 2.000 , wich is like US 820 - 900 dollars, still out of reach for the majority of brazilian customers.
Now the Wii U might come here for R$ 1.200 to 1.400 = US 450 - 620 dollars.
So as we can see the Wii U is much more interesting for its price range, let alone the games itself.
About Us |
Terms of Use |
Privacy Policy |
Advertise |
Staff |
Contact
Display As Desktop
Display As Mobile
© 2006-2024 VGChartz Ltd. All rights reserved.
