Fabulous news :D

The UK sure isn't the same it was 20 year ago. I say eat your heart out Margaret Thatcher, and everyone who supported(s) her homophobia.

good news now lets see which country has the balls to do tax rate equality across all classes.

Not quite following you.   Do you mean flat taxes, ones graduated by income and resource use or something else?

I do like how, I think it's Sweeden, adjust your car ticket prices by income.  So a person with low income might have a $20 ticket, and a person who makes 20 million a year, might have a $400,000 one.

"Marriage Equality for all!"

ha, being dishonest as always i see. thats quite the recurring theme with your crowd.

its just marriage for straight and gay monogamous couples.

there are still many people that are left out of this "equality for all"

I meant that the legislation passed ages ago thanks to Cameron and it's just taken this long to finally get all the way through the chain.

I believe what he is referring to is that unlike most countries their is no equal protection principle in regards to taxes.

So that if I make $40,000 and you make $40,000 we could pay totally different tax rates before any deductables are factored in because we do different jobs... or even have different races! (Though no such law regarding race exists to my knowledge.)

It is funny though how much people focus on income tax when there is so many other factors.

http://www.economist.com/blogs/democracyinamerica/2011/12/inequality-and-taxes

awesome. when the economy collapses history books will tell of our gay orgies and decadence.

Yep flat rate taxes. They should come in. Why should people who work hard to move up in the workforce pay more taxes? 

EDIT: sorry had to rush out so coldn't finish typing and noticed i actually hit send.

My more taxes I mean a higher %. In a way I do not mind that but what is annoying is everythign is means tested. So jsut because you earn X you have to pay additional levys to fund say the public medical system. On top of that if you don't get private health you have to pay a further levy. Why do I have to be forced to get private health? Why don't I get a choice If I want the public system if I am already paying more taxes and extra levys?  This is obviously jsut one example, so I don't want to sidetrack this thread further off topic.

As I have pointed out before, it is refering to Gender Equality.  That someones marriage is not in any way effected by the gender of the two people involved.

Sorry if what ever kind of marriage you are seeking is not allowed yet.  But then it would seem, that it is not part of gender marriage equality rights then.

I think it really depends how they make and spend the money.

I think people working of the money, is quite different from others living off inheritance or something they haven't worked for.

Currently, the USA is severely stacked to the benefit of non-worker types.