By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close

Forums - General Discussion - Does this not justify belief in a God...

Shinobi-san on 04 May 2013

You trying to apply everyday logic to solve the mysteries of the universe... It doesn't work that way.



Intel Core i7 3770K [3.5GHz]|MSI Big Bang Z77 Mpower|Corsair Vengeance DDR3-1866 2 x 4GB|MSI GeForce GTX 560 ti Twin Frozr 2|OCZ Vertex 4 128GB|Corsair HX750|Cooler Master CM 690II Advanced|

Around the Network
Lafiel on 04 May 2013
pokoko said:
The most likely scenario is that an intelligent, rational, creative being existed, by itself, without any kind of evolution or outside stimuli? Incredibly, unimaginably complex, floating in a void? Sorry, I just can't understand that as being a likely possibility, or at least any more likely than anything else someone could dream up.

that guy probably is the void, or atleast to all our methods of detection he is indiscernible from the void .. or he is all matter and all energy, which means he is everything



Troll_Whisperer on 04 May 2013

Going by these, option 1 seems like the least likely by far.



No troll is too much for me to handle. I rehabilitate trolls, I train people. I am the Troll Whisperer.

Slimebeast on 04 May 2013

It takes a God to make something out of nothing. That's the only reasonable answer to me.



Mummelmann on 04 May 2013

Applying god to anything and everything we can't explain at present is the very reason faith has survived to this day. It's an incredibly simplified and narrow view in my opinion and proves nothing.



Around the Network
IIIIITHE1IIIII on 04 May 2013

Well, it takes a shit ton of faith to believe that that one option specifically is the right one out of countless possibilities. Let alone call it more likely than that something else happened that our minds cannot comprehend.



NobleTeam360 on 04 May 2013
S.Peelman said:
The only reason there is a religion (any), is because people back when they were invented couldn't come up with a better way to explain our existence. They didn't have science, they couldn't explain anything, they couldn't prove anything.

In today's age, with numerous ways to prove all kinds of things, I don't see how the simple answer of 'something just made everything, for the fun of it', is in any way the most likely way to explain our existence. Let alone having to explain how that 'something' came into existence and gained self-concience itself in the first place. That said, I also don't believe mankind today has all the answers figured out, and we probably never will. For now, option 2 is by far the most likely, with a hint of option 3.

Yet with all that science they still can't disprove God exists or doesn't exist. 



Boutros on 04 May 2013

I just don't think the human can understand the concept of infinity.



Nem on 04 May 2013
Slimebeast said:
It takes a God to make something out of nothing. That's the only reasonable answer to me.

 

Of course, the easy way out is to think a God does it cause you cant understand it.



IIIIITHE1IIIII on 04 May 2013
NobleTeam360 said:
S.Peelman said:
The only reason there is a religion (any), is because people back when they were invented couldn't come up with a better way to explain our existence. They didn't have science, they couldn't explain anything, they couldn't prove anything.

In today's age, with numerous ways to prove all kinds of things, I don't see how the simple answer of 'something just made everything, for the fun of it', is in any way the most likely way to explain our existence. Let alone having to explain how that 'something' came into existence and gained self-concience itself in the first place. That said, I also don't believe mankind today has all the answers figured out, and we probably never will. For now, option 2 is by far the most likely, with a hint of option 3.

Yet with all that science they still can't disprove God exists or doesn't exist. 


Science can't disprove unicorns either. What's your point?